Hi ,
Are your OSDs disk file system btrfs ? or ext4 ,ext3 , or ??
i use ceph 0.23 , ubuntu 10.10 x86_64,2.6.35-22 ,mount btrfs osd is
successful, but mount ext4 osd fail, with its logs , it seems that it
should set "osd journal = /PATH/TO/JOURNAL" at ceph.conf and set
"user_xattr" at /etc/fstab.
Hi Dan,
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi hi!
>
> This is a smatch thing. We check if last is NULL and then dereference
> it later with out checking. It might be worth looking at. I'm not
> familiar enough with the code to know the fix.
>
> It comes from:
> commit 2817b000b
Hi Jim,
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Jim Schutt wrote:
> I've just created a brand-new filesystem using current unstable
> branch.
>
> ceph -w shows me this after I start it up and it settles down,:
>
> 2010-11-19 13:07:39.279045pg v247: 3432 pgs: 3432 active; 54 KB data,
> 98200 KB used, 3032 GB /
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:48:54PM -0800, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:42:51PM -0800, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Greg KH w
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:48:54PM -0800, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:42:51PM -0800, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:53:35PM -0800,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 04:45:31PM -0800, Sage Weil wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:33:07PM -0800, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
> > > wrote:
> > > > One solution would be t
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:42:51PM -0800, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:53:35PM -0800, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
>> >> Yes, pretty much. One problem that I do see
Hi Greg,
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:33:07PM -0800, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
> > wrote:
> > > One solution would be to create kobjects for (3) and for (4), without
> > > using a group name. Anot
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:33:07PM -0800, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
> wrote:
> > One solution would be to create kobjects for (3) and for (4), without
> > using a group name. Another way, we can create groups for (2), and (3)
> > under (1)
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:42:51PM -0800, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:53:35PM -0800, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
> >> Yes, pretty much. One problem that I do see is that if we define the
> >> snaps/ as a device (and
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
wrote:
> One solution would be to create kobjects for (3) and for (4), without
> using a group name. Another way, we can create groups for (2), and (3)
> under (1), but that's about it, you can't create the snap specific
> directory this w
From: Tracey Dent
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 20:03:11 -0500
> I changed Makefiles to use -y instead of -objs because -objs
> is deprecated and not even mentioned in Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt.
>
> Also, remove some if-conditional statments because I used the ccflags-$ flag
> instead of EXTR
12 matches
Mail list logo
