Sorry, I screwed up... it was an iptables issue. I thought I had it
permanently off but didn't.
The ceph filesystem mounts just fine.
10.200.98.111:/ on /mnt/ceph type ceph
(name=admin,secret=AQC63/5MEMaTLBAAuiYetlbkHBjj0WNtAjOsQg==)
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Brian Chrisman wrote:
> On T
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Jeff Wu wrote:
>> Hi ,i take the followng steps , fail to mount,too.
>>
>> ## save auth secret to a file:
>> $cauthtool --print-key /etc/ceph/keyring.bin > /etc/ceph/secret
>> chmod 600 /etc/ceph/secret
>> ## future ,support,re
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Brian Chrisman wrote:
> I've built RPMs for RHEL6beta from the spec file in the rc (checked
> out as of Monday) using the provided ceph.spec.
> Thus far I've run into a few issues:
> 1) Version: 0.24~rc ... converted to 0.24.rc (doesn't like the ~ symbol)
> 2)
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Jeff Wu wrote:
> Hi ,i take the followng steps , fail to mount,too.
>
> ## save auth secret to a file:
> $cauthtool --print-key /etc/ceph/keyring.bin > /etc/ceph/secret
> chmod 600 /etc/ceph/secret
> ## future ,support,read a secret from a file
> $ mount -t ceph 172.16.50.10:67
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Jeff Wu wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 在 2010-12-08三的 09:53 +0800，Brian Chrisman写道：
>> I've built and installed RPMs for ceph for RHEL6beta.
>> I've placed the below ceph.conf in /etc/ceph on both of my test nodes
>> (test10, test11).
>>
>> I build a ceph filesystem and hide
在 2010-12-08三的 09:53 +0800，Brian Chrisman写道：
> I've built and installed RPMs for ceph for RHEL6beta.
> I've placed the below ceph.conf in /etc/ceph on both of my test nodes
> (test10, test11).
>
> I build a ceph filesystem and hide the key
> mkcephfs -c /etc/ceph/ceph.conf -a --mkbtrfs -k /e
I've built and installed RPMs for ceph for RHEL6beta.
I've placed the below ceph.conf in /etc/ceph on both of my test nodes
(test10, test11).
I build a ceph filesystem and hide the key
mkcephfs -c /etc/ceph/ceph.conf -a --mkbtrfs -k /etc/ceph/keyring.bin
cauthtool --print-key /etc/ceph/keyring.bin
I've built RPMs for RHEL6beta from the spec file in the rc (checked
out as of Monday) using the provided ceph.spec.
Thus far I've run into a few issues:
1) Version: 0.24~rc ... converted to 0.24.rc (doesn't like the ~ symbol)
2) 'gui_resources' not getting into BUILDROOT correctly.. I'm
comm
Signed-off-by: Josh Durgin
---
tests/qemuargv2xmltest.c |3 ++
.../qemuxml2argv-disk-drive-network-nbd.args |1 +
.../qemuxml2argv-disk-drive-network-nbd.xml| 32 ++
.../qemuxml2argv-disk-drive-network-rbd.args |1 +
...
Changes common to all network disks:
-Make source name optional in the domain schema, since NBD doesn't use it
-Add a hostName type to the domain schema, and use it instead of genericName,
which doesn't include .
-Don't leak host names or ports
-Set the source protocol in qemuParseCommandline
Si
Here are patches on top of Kazutaka's v2 to add RBD support and fix
some general network disk problems. There's also a test for each type
of network disk.
Josh Durgin (2):
qemu: Add RBD support and some network disk fixes
tests: Add tests for network disks
docs/schemas/domain.rng
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:54 -0700, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Jim Schutt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Commit 15d8bdf3bf switched to libcrypto++ (AKA libcryptopp)
> > for aes, rather than openssl.
> >
> > It appears that RedHat does not package this
> > library for ei
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Jim Schutt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Commit 15d8bdf3bf switched to libcrypto++ (AKA libcryptopp)
> for aes, rather than openssl.
>
> It appears that RedHat does not package this
> library for either Enterprise 5
> http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Client/en
Hi,
Commit 15d8bdf3bf switched to libcrypto++ (AKA libcryptopp)
for aes, rather than openssl.
It appears that RedHat does not package this
library for either Enterprise 5
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Client/en/os/SRPMS/
or Enterprise 6
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/li
Hi Sage,
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 21:59 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I think there are at least two different things going on here.
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Jim Schutt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 15:36 -0700, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> > > How are you generating these files? It sounds li
15 matches
Mail list logo
