Re: rbd create error with 0.26

Hope this help: === GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora (7.0.50.20100203-15.el5) Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistr

Re: [ceph-commit] ceph.git branch master updated. v0.27.1-331-gd9ea95f

Hi all. As we noted earlier, "rados get" and "rados put" do gets and puts, respectively. This is different from "export" and "import" which have always synchronized whole pools. I guess we can have syntax like this for the import and export: rados sync [import|export] I will implement that in

Re: [PATCH 1/2] support for xattrs in libceph

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote: > lsetxattr and friends are known linux API functions, and have > corresponding system calls with the same name. I say let's keep them > as is. Heh. Should probably just ignore clueless me in that case. :) -- To unsubscribe from this l

Re: [PATCH 1/2] support for xattrs in libceph

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Brian Chrisman wrote: >> They differentiate between xattrs on symlinks or on the files at which >> they point. >> If I recall, it's a slight difference internally to the Client class >> whether a value is pa

Re: [PATCH 1/2] support for xattrs in libceph

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Brian Chrisman wrote: > @@ -5708,7 +5773,7 @@ int Client::ll_removexattr(vinodeno_t vino, const char > *name, int uid, int gid) >   tout << name << std::endl; > >   // only user xattrs, for now > -  if (strncmp(name, "user.", 5)) > +  if (strncmp(name, "user.", 5

Re: [PATCH 1/2] support for xattrs in libceph

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Brian Chrisman wrote: > They differentiate between xattrs on symlinks or on the files at which > they point. > If I recall, it's a slight difference internally to the Client class > whether a value is passed to path_walk as true/false, though I may be > misinterpre

Re: [PATCH 1/2] support for xattrs in libceph

They differentiate between xattrs on symlinks or on the files at which they point. If I recall, it's a slight difference internally to the Client class whether a value is passed to path_walk as true/false, though I may be misinterpreting that. I can look at that again. On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] support for xattrs in libceph

What are the 'l'-prefixed functions for? They look like they're just duplicates except for the prefix. -Greg On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Brian Chrisman wrote: > From: Brian Chrisman > > > Signed-off-by: Brian Chrisman > --- >  src/client/Client.cc       |   67 > +

[PATCH 2/2] expand testceph to check xattrs

Signed-off-by: Brian Chrisman --- src/client/testceph.cc | 74 +++- 1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/client/testceph.cc b/src/client/testceph.cc index 1bbd81d..da4b7a2 100644 --- a/src/client/testceph.cc +++ b/src/c

[PATCH 1/2] support for xattrs in libceph

From: Brian Chrisman Signed-off-by: Brian Chrisman --- src/client/Client.cc | 67 +++- src/client/Client.h| 10 ++ src/include/ceph/libceph.h | 15 ++ src/libceph.cc | 42 +++ 4 files

[PATCH 0/2] adding libceph xattr support

Expands libceph to handle xattr calls including underlying Client methods. testceph is expanded to verify libceph xattr calls work. Brian Chrisman (2): support for xattrs in libceph expand testceph to check xattrs src/client/Client.cc | 67 +++- sr

Re: Kernel 2.6.38.6 page allocation failure (ixgbe)

Hi Sage, On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > On Tue, 10 May 2011, Stefan Majer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub >> wrote: >> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Stefan Majer >> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> im running 4

Re: Kernel 2.6.38.6 page allocation failure (ixgbe)

Hi Stefan, On Tue, 10 May 2011, Stefan Majer wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub > wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Stefan Majer > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> im running 4 nodes with ceph on top of btrfs with a dualport Intel > >> X520 10Gb Ethern

Re: Kernel 2.6.38.6 page allocation failure (ixgbe)

Hi, On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Stefan Majer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> im running 4 nodes with ceph on top of btrfs with a dualport Intel >> X520 10Gb Ethernet Card with the latest 3.3.9 ixgbe driver. >> during benchmarks i get the f

Re: rbd create error with 0.26

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Simon Tian wrote: > Hi, > >    As you said, one of the osds crashed: > = log > 2011-05-10 21:46:38.990311 4bc90940 osd2 8 pg[3.13a( v 8'1 (0'0,8'1] > n=1 ec=2 les=6 5/5/4) [2,3] r=0 mlcod 0'0 active+clean] > oi.user_version=

Re: rbd create error with 0.26

YES!! After try several times if I create a rbd, one of the cosd will coredump. 2011/5/10 Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub : > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Simon Tian wrote: >> Sorry, I didn't learn the wiki carefullly.. >> >> There is another problem: >> ===

Re: Kernel 2.6.38.6 page allocation failure (ixgbe)

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Stefan Majer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> im running 4 nodes with ceph on top of btrfs with a dualport Intel >> X520 10Gb Ethernet Card with the latest 3.3.9 ixgbe driver. >> during benchmarks i get the follow

Re: Kernel 2.6.38.6 page allocation failure (ixgbe)

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Stefan Majer wrote: > Hi, > > im running 4 nodes with ceph on top of btrfs with a dualport Intel > X520 10Gb Ethernet Card with the latest 3.3.9 ixgbe driver. > during benchmarks i get the following stack. > I can easily reproduce this by simply running rados bench

Re: rbd create error with 0.26

Hi, As you said, one of the osds crashed: = log 2011-05-10 21:46:38.990311 4bc90940 osd2 8 pg[3.13a( v 8'1 (0'0,8'1] n=1 ec=2 les=6 5/5/4) [2,3] r=0 mlcod 0'0 active+clean] oi.user_version=8'2 is_modify=0 2011-05-10 21:46:38.990386 4bc90940 osd2 8 pg[3.

Kernel 2.6.38.6 page allocation failure (ixgbe)

Hi, im running 4 nodes with ceph on top of btrfs with a dualport Intel X520 10Gb Ethernet Card with the latest 3.3.9 ixgbe driver. during benchmarks i get the following stack. I can easily reproduce this by simply running rados bench from a fast machine using this 4 nodes as ceph cluster. We saw t

Re: rbd create error with 0.26

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Simon Tian wrote: > Sorry, I didn't learn the wiki carefullly.. > > There is another problem: > > [root@mon-00 ~]# rbd create foo --size 1024 > 2011-05-11 02:37:15.400313 42d6a940 -- 10.250.6.98:0/1010326 >>

Re: rbd create error with 0.26

2011/5/10 Fyodor Ustinov : > Simon Tian gmail.com> writes: > >> [root mon-00 ~]# cclass -a >> [root mon-00 ~]# ceph class list > > Do you forget "ceph class activate rbd 1.3" ? > As the log show, the rbd 1.3 is already active: [root@mon-00 ~]# rbd create foo --size 1024 2011-05-11 05:46:59.074

Re: rbd create error with 0.26

Sorry, I didn't learn the wiki carefullly.. There is another problem: [root@mon-00 ~]# rbd create foo --size 1024 2011-05-11 02:37:15.400313 42d6a940 -- 10.250.6.98:0/1010326 >> 10.250.6.30:6801/3051 pipe(0x63f140 sd=6 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).fault

RE: Unable to Add Monitor

Thanks, that did it. I didn't realize that the osd's were that full, so I have deleted some redundant data I had in the file system so that I can test. I will now trying adding the second and third monitors to the cluster. On Mon, 9 May 2011, Mark Nigh wrote: > I was able to get the monitor back

Re: rbd create error with 0.26

Simon Tian gmail.com> writes: > [root mon-00 ~]# cclass -a > [root mon-00 ~]# ceph class list Do you forget "ceph class activate rbd 1.3" ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at h

Re: rbd create error with 0.26

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Simon Tian wrote: > [root@mon-00 ~]# rbd create foo --size 1024 > 2011-05-10 17:42:44.227398 7fa9411866f0 librbd: failed to assign a > block name for image > create error: Input/output error > > I just done as thi

Re: qemu librbd patches

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Josh Durgin wrote: > On Mon, 9 May 2011 10:59:41 +0200, Christian Brunner > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> after upgrading to qemu with josh's librbd patches I'm triggering the >> following assertion, when I'm running "yum upgrade" inside a guest. >> >> I suspect there is a r