When I mount ceph after the file system. I want to go to create a
file, but hint permissions problem, cannot write
In /var/log/ceph log information inside, didn't see more information
[root@ceph_client /]# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1
I have mount on ceph file system, but, after entering directory cannot
read documents.
[root@ceph_client 1]# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1472658192 20199408 428449108 5% /
tmpfs 1984548 0 1984548 0% /dev
Ok. The exceptions issue. Flamewar in 3... 2... 1...
Although most of Ceph is C++, a lot of the code in Ceph is written in a C-like
style. Partly this is because we want to use the low-level features of C++ is
gain some additional efficiency. Partly this is because we supply C APIs and
interact wi
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 12:44:30AM +0300, Fyodor Ustinov wrote:
> > As I understand with -m key cfuse should not require ceph.conf.
>
> It does need a config, to even know whether it should attempt
> cryptographic authentication or not (and where to fin
HI
Everybody!
Who can give me some information about CEPH file locks
CEPH files lock mechanism is how
--
name:Riby
mobile:+86 15280267642
company: 百大龙一
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 12:44:30AM +0300, Fyodor Ustinov wrote:
> As I understand with -m key cfuse should not require ceph.conf.
It does need a config, to even know whether it should attempt
cryptographic authentication or not (and where to find the key, etc).
It could be changed to do things mo
Hi!
As I understand with -m key cfuse should not require ceph.conf.
But:
root@st8:~# cfuse -m 10.5.51.230:6789 /stor01
common_init: unable to open config file.
root@st8:~#
Workaround:
root@st8:~# cfuse -c /dev/null -m 10.5.51.230:6789 /stor01
failed to open log file '/var/log/ceph/client.admi
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:52:35AM -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
> FWIW, I believe I saw such errors on RHEL 5 due to it having
> boost v1.33.1, while Ceph needs v1.34 or newer to get statechart.
It seems we don't have a versioned dependency on libboost. I created a
ticket to make it so. Like a captain
Tommi Virtanen wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 02:23:10PM +0800, Simon Tian wrote:
hi folks,
When I make ceph after ./configure, error comes both in 0.28.1
and 0.28.2 like bellow:
./include/encoding.h:294: error: no matching function for call to
?.ecode(PG::Log::Entry&, ceph::buffer::list
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 02:23:10PM +0800, Simon Tian wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> When I make ceph after ./configure, error comes both in 0.28.1
> and 0.28.2 like bellow:
>
> ./include/encoding.h:294: error: no matching function for call to
> ?.ecode(PG::Log::Entry&, ceph::buffer::list::iterator&
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Sylar Shen wrote:
>> Hi Gregory,
>> Thanks for your information very much!
>> Dropbox could limit the quota value of each user.
>> Does Dropbox implement the quota function by recording every size of
>> file
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Sylar Shen wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
> Thanks for your information very much!
> Dropbox could limit the quota value of each user.
> Does Dropbox implement the quota function by recording every size of
> file in its own database?
> Or Dropbox just controls the quota of e
On 05/31/2011 05:51 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
Sage created an issue to track this:
http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/1122
Based on the differences between the FUSE and kernel clients, it's
probably just readahead settings. :)
-Greg
I'm not sure.
rsize 10 times more than the default:
root@gat
Sage created an issue to track this:
http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/1122
Based on the differences between the FUSE and kernel clients, it's
probably just readahead settings. :)
-Greg
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Fyodor Ustinov wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 01:50 AM, Fyodor Ustinov wrote:
>>
>>
On 05/31/2011 01:50 AM, Fyodor Ustinov wrote:
Hi!
Fresh 0.28.2 cluster.
Why reading two times slower than the writing by dd, but rados show
different.
(Second question - why rados bench crash on read test?)
root@gate0:/mnt# dd if=/dev/zero of=aaa bs=1024000 count=1
1+0 records in
10
> Caching effect decreases as the writing size increases. Sure, when you
> write 100GB+ data, the difference may be subtle. (It still depends on
> your RAM size.)
>
RAM does no play when goes over 100gb+ too, I've gone mad and tried 4
8 12 18gb ram.
Again, huge impact/differences at the start, but
2011/5/31 djlee064 :
> From my (bad) memory, I've tried fsync, and the resulting was still
> the same in the end, i.e., write 100gb+ and all will be the same.
> Can't test it now as it is already running other tasks..
>
> I think the small bs (4-8k) results to ~ KB/s level using fsync. and
> large,
17 matches
Mail list logo