On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:37:11AM +0800, shu ming wrote:
On 2011-10-21 5:48, Josh Durgin wrote:
On 10/20/2011 12:24 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:30:42AM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
We're working on libvirt support for block device
authentication [1]. To
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 02:48:15PM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
On 10/20/2011 12:24 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:30:42AM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
We're working on libvirt support for block device authentication [1]. To
authenticate, rbd needs a username and a secret.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:30:39AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 20.10.2011 23:48, schrieb Josh Durgin:
On 10/20/2011 12:24 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:30:42AM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
We're working on libvirt support for block device authentication [1]. To
When I want to delete a snapshot, everything is working, but there is
a strange error message:
# rbd create --size=100 image
# rbd snap create --snap=image-snap1 image
# rbd snap ls image
8 image-snap1 104857600
# rbd snap rm --snap=image-snap1 image
2011-10-21 11:35:58.506393
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:41:55 +0200, Christian Brunner c...@muc.de
wrote:
When I want to delete a snapshot, everything is working, but there is
a strange error message:
# rbd create --size=100 image
# rbd snap create --snap=image-snap1 image
# rbd snap ls image
8 image-snap1
I added a few new statuses to the tracker:
- Need More Info (e.g. logs, core, whatever)
- Verified
The problem I was having was keeping track of which bugs needed more info,
which ones someone was actively trying to reproduce, and then which ones
had been reproduced and had logs.
Once it
[adding ceph-devel CC]
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Noah Watkins wrote:
Hi Sage,
This commit works fine, but I stumbled upon an additional complication
when building up the rest of the ACL code.
The ACL initialization semantics can alter the i_mode entry of the new
inode. However, since i_mode
- Original Message -
From: Sage Weil s...@newdream.net
The mode for the newly created object is being passed to the mds for
each
request as part of the args struct/union. And it looks like it's being
used on the MDS for everything except symlink (which always gets 0777
+
the type
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Noah Watkins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sage Weil s...@newdream.net
The mode for the newly created object is being passed to the mds for
each
request as part of the args struct/union. And it looks like it's being
used on the MDS for everything
