Hi Tommi,
Thanks for your reply. I want just virtualization on my ceph system. I will
explain you the exact implementation that I want in my ceph system. I want to
run 10 virtual machine instances on my ceph client whilst utilizing the storage
on the rest of the two systems. I tried to study
On 06/10/12 23:32, Sébastien Han wrote:
Hello everyone,
I recently posted on my website an introduction to ceph and the
integration of Ceph in OpenStack.
It could be really helpful since the OpenStack documentation has not
dealt with it so far.
Feel free to comment, express your opinions
On Jun 7, 2012, at 11:33 AM, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
RADOS, RBD and radosgw are considered production ready, when
configured correctly. Inktank is actively providing commercial support
for those components.
Are there any particular minimum versions of the Linux kernel or qemu-kvm that
would
On 06/07/2012 02:44 PM, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:52 AM, John Axel Erikssonj...@insane.se wrote:
Do you recommend btrfs or perhaps xfs for osds etc?
Right now I think the preference order is xfs btrfs ext4, but we keep
seeing performance reliability issues fairly
From: Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
PGMap-num_pg_by_state is a PG state to number of PG in the state
mapping. PGMonitor::update_logger wrongly interprets the mapping.
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
---
src/mon/PGMonitor.cc | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6
Dear All:
I saw rbd support async writes since 0.36, http://ceph.com/2011/09/
But I cannot find related document that how to turn on it.
Should I just write enabled to /sys/devices/rbd/0/power/async?
One more thing, If I want to implement iSCSI multipath with RBD, just
like
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, eric_yh_c...@wiwynn.com wrote:
Dear All:
I saw rbd support async writes since 0.36, http://ceph.com/2011/09/
But I cannot find related document that how to turn on it.
Should I just write enabled to /sys/devices/rbd/0/power/async?
This was referring to the
Hey-
The librados api tests were calling a dummy test_exec method in cls_rbd
that apparently got removed. We probably want to replace the test with
*something*, though... maybe a version or similar command that just
returns the version of the class? Or an OSD built-in dummy class with
