On 08/22/2012 04:39 PM, Stephen Perkins wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a place we can set up a group of hardware recipes that people can
query and modify over time? It would be good if people could submit and
"group modify" the recipes. I would envision "hypothetical" configurations
and "deployed/te
Hi,
the size of the rbd data objects on the OSD is 4 MByte (default).
Best Regards
Andreas
Samuel Just wrote:
What rbd block size were you using?
-Sam
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Andreas Bluemle
wrote:
Hi,
Samuel Just wrote:
Was the cluster complete healthy at the time th
On 08/22/2012 05:46 PM, Jonathan Proulx wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:17:23PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
:On 08/22/2012 03:55 PM, Jonathan Proulx wrote:
:You can also use the USB sticks[0] from Stec, they have servergrade
:onboard USB sticks for these kind of applications.
Those look
From: Iulius Curt
Make ceph_monc_do_poolop() static to remove the following sparse warning:
* net/ceph/mon_client.c:616:5: warning: symbol 'ceph_monc_do_poolop' was not
declared. Should it be static?
Also drops the 'ceph_monc_' prefix, now being a private function.
Signed-off-by: Iulius Curt
On 08/23/2012 11:41 AM, RamuNaidu Eppa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want build ceph upon zfs file system,now iam installed ceph upon
> btrfs filesystem.
> Please help me to ceph buils upon zfs filesystem.
>
> Thanks,
> Ramu.
Hello Ramu,
I suspect the right place for this question would be the ceph-
On 08/23/2012 06:02 AM, RamuNaidu Eppa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>I want to install radosgw,ifollwed the steps
> "http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/manual-install/"; but after i tried
> the command "sudo apt-get install radosgw"
> was not working it is showing error,
> Reading package lists... Done
All:
I have a 16-OSD cluster running 0.48 (Argonaut), built from source.
I rebuilt the entire cluster on Sunday Evening 8-19-2012, and started some
rados testing.
I have a custom CRUSH map, that calls for the "rbd", "metadata" pools and a
custom pool called "SCSI" to be pulled from osd.0-11, w
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Ryan Nicholson wrote:
> All:
>
> I have a 16-OSD cluster running 0.48 (Argonaut), built from source.
>
> I rebuilt the entire cluster on Sunday Evening 8-19-2012, and started some
> rados testing.
>
> I have a custom CRUSH map, that calls for the "rbd", "metadata"
Hi List;
I am attempting to get a test ceph cluster up and running. I am using
ceph-0.50 across all nodes. I am attempting to get the number of pgs
to be around 100 per osd as per the documentation at:
http://ceph.com/docs/master/dev/placement-group/
I have attempted to increase the pgs via seve
I know this is an old build, but I just want to verify that this isn't
an unknown bug. For context, the attached log covers the time from
when server .15 dropped off the net (we think power failure at this
point). OSDs 72, 73, 74, and 75 are on the node which apparently lost
power.
Ceph version
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Mandell Degerness wrote:
> I know this is an old build, but I just want to verify that this isn't
> an unknown bug. For context, the attached log covers the time from
> when server .15 dropped off the net (we think power failure at this
> point). OSDs 72, 73, 74, and 75 are o
On 08/23/2012 02:39 PM, Tren Blackburn wrote:
2) Increase the number of pgs via ceph.conf (osd pg bits = 7) and
create the cluster. This does not work either as the cluster comes up
with 6 pgs bits per osd still.
re:http://ceph.com/docs/master/config-cluster/osd-config-ref/
I use this regu
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 02:39 PM, Tren Blackburn wrote:
>>
>> 2) Increase the number of pgs via ceph.conf (osd pg bits = 7) and
>> create the cluster. This does not work either as the cluster comes up
>> with 6 pgs bits per osd still.
>> re:http://ce
Thanks, Greg! Here's the link to all of the dumps you asked for:
http://pastebin.com/y4bPwSz8
Let me know what you think!
Ryan Nicholson
-Original Message-
From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Gregory Farnum
Sent: Thursday, Augu
On 08/23/2012 03:26 PM, Tren Blackburn wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
On 08/23/2012 02:39 PM, Tren Blackburn wrote:
2) Increase the number of pgs via ceph.conf (osd pg bits = 7) and
create the cluster. This does not work either as the cluster comes up
with 6 pgs bit
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 03:26 PM, Tren Blackburn wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/23/2012 02:39 PM, Tren Blackburn wrote:
2) Increase the number of pgs via ceph.conf (osd pg bits = 7) and
c
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 03:26 PM, Tren Blackburn wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/23/2012 02:39 PM, Tren Blackburn wrote:
2) Increase the number of pgs via ceph.conf (osd pg bits = 7) and
c
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
>> On 08/23/2012 03:26 PM, Tren Blackburn wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
On 08/23/2012 02:39 PM, Tren Blackburn wrote:
>
>
> 2) Inc
http://pastebin.com/5bRiUTxf
Greg I've also attached a "ceph osd tree" dump (above). From what I can tell,
the tree is correct, and lines up with how I desire to weight the cluster(s),
however, I do see that the reweight for the smaller osds (SCSI-Nodes) are less
than 1. Perhaps I need to look
Wow, those are quite a dynamic range of numbers — I'm not sure you can
count on the cluster behaving well with that much happening in the
overrides. If you actually have OSDs with varying capacity, you should
give them different CRUSH weights (using "ceph osd crush set ...")
rather than using the m
20 matches
Mail list logo
