Hi,
All osds in the dev cluster died shortly after upgrade (packet-only,
i.e. binary upgrade, even without restart running processes), please
see attached file.
Was: 0.55.1-356-g850d1d5
Upgraded to: 0.56 tag
The only one difference is a version of the gcc corresponding
libstdc++ - 4.6 on the bui
OK thanks! Will change that.
Am 31.12.2012 20:21, schrieb Samuel Just:
The ceph-osd relies on fs barriers for correctness. You will want to
remove the nobarrier option to prevent future corruption.
-Sam
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 31.12.2012 02:10, schrieb Samuel
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All osds in the dev cluster died shortly after upgrade (packet-only,
> i.e. binary upgrade, even without restart running processes), please
> see attached file.
>
> Was: 0.55.1-356-g850d1d5
> Upgraded to: 0.56 tag
>
> The only one di
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> All osds in the dev cluster died shortly after upgrade (packet-only,
>> i.e. binary upgrade, even without restart running processes), please
>> see attached file.
>>
>> Wa
Hi,
apparently the RPM link points to version 0.52. Where can the RPMs for 0.56
be found?
Regards,
Dennis
On 01/01/2013 07:02 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> We're bringing in the new year with a new release, v0.56, which will form
> the basis of the next stable series "bobtail." There is little in the
Doh! Sorry about that. It looks like they are still in rpm-testing:
http://www.ceph.com/rpm-testing/el6/x86_64/
I imagine Gary will have them in the non-testing repo some time tomorrow.
Mark
On 01/01/2013 08:24 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
apparently the RPM link points to version 0