Re: [ceph-users] Urgent Notice to Users on 0.61.1

On Fri, 10 May 2013, Sage Weil wrote: > On Fri, 10 May 2013, Mike Dawson wrote: > > Anyone running 0.61.1, > > > > Watch out for high disk usage due to a file likely located at > > /var/log/ceph/ceph-mon..tdump. This file contains debugging for > > monitor transactions. This debugging was added in

Re: Urgent Notice to Users on 0.61.1

On Fri, 10 May 2013, Mike Dawson wrote: > Anyone running 0.61.1, > > Watch out for high disk usage due to a file likely located at > /var/log/ceph/ceph-mon..tdump. This file contains debugging for > monitor transactions. This debugging was added in the past week or so to track > down another anoma

Re: [ceph-users] Urgent Notice to Users on 0.61.1

I also just pushed a fix to the cuttlefish branch, so if you want packages that fix this, you can get them from gitbuilders using the "testing" versions, branch "cuttlefish". Thanks, Mike, for pointing this out! On 05/10/2013 08:27 PM, Mike Dawson wrote: Anyone running 0.61.1, Watch out for

Urgent Notice to Users on 0.61.1

Anyone running 0.61.1, Watch out for high disk usage due to a file likely located at /var/log/ceph/ceph-mon..tdump. This file contains debugging for monitor transactions. This debugging was added in the past week or so to track down another anomaly. It is not necessary (or useful unless you a

Re: 0.56.6: MDS asserts on restart

Am 10.05.2013 17:41, schrieb Sage Weil: On Fri, 10 May 2013, Christopher Kunz wrote: Hi all, after our update to 0.56.6, all MDSes assert and crash on start. This is not essential for our setup, but still not great. We assume this might be due to a bug - see the nopaste below for a trace. http

Re: [ceph-users] e release

Please don't make me say Enteroctopus over and over again in sales meetings. :-) Something simple and easy please! N On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:51 PM, John Wilkins wrote: > As long as we have a picture. Enteroctopus is giant, which implies > large scale and is what we're about. I just like Enope

Re: [ceph-users] e release

On Fri, 10 May 2013, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > > We need a cephalopod name that starts with 'e', and trolling through > > taxonomies seems like a great thing to crowdsource. :) So far I've found > > a few latin names, but the main problem is that

Re: [ceph-users] e release

On Fri, 10 May 2013, John Wilkins wrote: > I like enteroctopus, but Enope is cool and shorter...  > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparkling_Enope_Squid I was saving this one for F; the common name is 'firefly squid'. :) sage > > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > We

Re: v0.61.1 released

Hi, Will it rebuild? I need it for my own build. Elbandi 2013/5/10 Sage Weil : > On Fri, 10 May 2013, Elso Andras wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Where is ceph_0.61.1-1.dsc? I could not find at >> http://ceph.com/debian-cuttlefish/pool/main/c/ceph/ > > There was some breakage in debian sid when we did the b

Re: [ceph-users] e release

As long as we have a picture. Enteroctopus is giant, which implies large scale and is what we're about. I just like Enope, because they are bio-luminescent. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparkling_Enope_Squid The pictures are kind of cool too. On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote

Re: [ceph-users] e release

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > We need a cephalopod name that starts with 'e', and trolling through > taxonomies seems like a great thing to crowdsource. :) So far I've found > a few latin names, but the main problem is that I can't find a single > large list of species wit

e release

We need a cephalopod name that starts with 'e', and trolling through taxonomies seems like a great thing to crowdsource. :) So far I've found a few latin names, but the main problem is that I can't find a single large list of species with the common names listed. Wikipedia's taxonomy seems t

Re: Seg Fault on rgw 0.61.1 with cluster in 0.61

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Yann ROBIN wrote: > Hi, > > I've tried to update the rgw to 0.61.1 and now I have a segfault while > connecting to the 0.61 cluster. > The rgw with version 0.61 run fine. > > *** Caught signal (Segmentation fault) ** > in thread 7fc1fec79780 > ceph version 0.61.

Re: 0.56.6: MDS asserts on restart

On Fri, 10 May 2013, Christopher Kunz wrote: > Hi all, > > after our update to 0.56.6, all MDSes assert and crash on start. This is > not essential for our setup, but still not great. We assume this might > be due to a bug - see the nopaste below for a trace. > > http://nopaste.info/aa06c50a2f.ht

RE: Seg Fault on rgw 0.61.1 with cluster in 0.61

On Fri, 10 May 2013, Yann ROBIN wrote: > I've downgraded the rgw to 0.60 and I still had the same issue. Yeah, the radosgw code is essentially identical between the two versions (there is a new config option but it is unused). > I returned to 0.61.1 and noticed that sometimes (1 on 10) the rado

0.56.6: MDS asserts on restart

Hi all, after our update to 0.56.6, all MDSes assert and crash on start. This is not essential for our setup, but still not great. We assume this might be due to a bug - see the nopaste below for a trace. http://nopaste.info/aa06c50a2f.html Regards, --ck -- To unsubscribe from this list: send t

RE: Seg Fault on rgw 0.61.1 with cluster in 0.61

I've downgraded the rgw to 0.60 and I still had the same issue. I returned to 0.61.1 and noticed that sometimes (1 on 10) the radosgw start normally. I've installed debug package of librados to do some debugging and now it always works... -Original Message- From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.k

Seg Fault on rgw 0.61.1 with cluster in 0.61

Hi, I've tried to update the rgw to 0.61.1 and now I have a segfault while connecting to the 0.61 cluster. The rgw with version 0.61 run fine. *** Caught signal (Segmentation fault) ** in thread 7fc1fec79780 ceph version 0.61.1 (56c4847ba82a92023700e2d4920b59cdaf23428d) 1: /usr/bin/radosgw()