On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Guangliang Zhao wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 04:20:46PM -0800, Sage Weil wrote:
>
> Hi Sage,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, I just returned from a long vacation :-)
No problem. Welcome back!
> I have found some issues which maybe relate the bugs you mentioned, and
> the
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 04:20:46PM -0800, Sage Weil wrote:
Hi Sage,
Sorry for the late reply, I just returned from a long vacation :-)
I have found some issues which maybe relate the bugs you mentioned, and
the patches are coming soon.
> Hi Guangliang,
>
> There were a few hiccups getting the
On 02/12/2014 10:43 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> On 02/12/2014 01:25 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
>>> On 02/11/2014 09:10 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 02/10/2014 11:30 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> Signed-off-by
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On 02/12/2014 01:25 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
> > On 02/11/2014 09:10 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> >>> On 02/10/2014 11:30 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng
> >>>
> >>> You really need to
On 02/12/2014 01:25 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 02/11/2014 09:10 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
>>> On 02/10/2014 11:30 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng
>>>
>>> You really need to explain better under what circumstances
>>> a zero-s
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Dominik Mostowiec wrote:
> Hi,
> If this problem (with stucked active+remapped pgs after
> reweight-by-utilisation) affects all ceph configurations or only
> specific ones?
> If specific: what is the reason in my case? Is this caused by crush
> configuration (cluster architectu
Hi,
If this problem (with stucked active+remapped pgs after
reweight-by-utilisation) affects all ceph configurations or only
specific ones?
If specific: what is the reason in my case? Is this caused by crush
configuration (cluster architecture, crush tunnables, ...), cluster
size, architecture desi
On 02/10/2014 11:30 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> If acl is equivalent to file mode permission bits, ceph_set_acl()
> needs to remove any existing acl xattr. Use __ceph_setxattr() to
> handle both setting and removing acl xattr cases, it doesn't return
> -ENODATA when there is no acl xattr.
This looks g
On 02/10/2014 11:30 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
This looks OK to me but you should get another
opinion, I haven't really given it as thorough a
review as I normally do.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng
> ---
> fs/ceph/dir.c | 9 +
> fs/ceph/file.c | 1 +
> 2 files change
On 02/11/2014 09:10 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
>> On 02/10/2014 11:30 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng
>>
>> You really need to explain better under what circumstances
>> a zero-size xattr is getting removed.
>>
>> But apparently
This should be it:
https://github.com/linuxbox2/linuxbox-ceph/tree/wip-libcephfs-firefly-rb
Matt
- "Sage Weil" wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It looks to me like the rebase was already done--I thought Casey
> needed me to finish that up,
> > but e
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 02/10/2014 11:30 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng
>
> You really need to explain better under what circumstances
> a zero-size xattr is getting removed.
>
> But apparently it's only when you're updating an xattr
> (not bui
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks to me like the rebase was already done--I thought Casey needed me to
> finish that up,
> but everything just built for me.
What is the URL for the posted branch?
Thanks!
sage
>
> Matt
>
> - "Sage Weil" wrote:
>
> > Hey Ma
On 02/10/2014 11:30 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng
You need a better explanation than "fix."
We have the ENODATA thing (versus ENOATTR), but again
what you have is fine.
> ---
> fs/ceph/xattr.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph
On 02/10/2014 11:30 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng
You really need to explain better under what circumstances
a zero-size xattr is getting removed.
But apparently it's only when you're updating an xattr
(not building it up from a blob from storage).
Why are you doing this? W
On 02/10/2014 11:30 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> return -EEXIST if XATTR_CREATE is set and xattr alread exists.
> return -ENODATA if XATTR_REPLACE is set but xattr does not exist.
(I have a set of changes to this source file that I never
got in; I'll see if I can dig them up and post them for
review to
On 01/17/2014 02:39 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi James (CC to devel),
I've been trying to get a patch [0] into libvirt for the last couple of
months to have libvirt create RBD images format 2 by default.
The response from the RedHat people has been zero until thus far. Since
this would be g
17 matches
Mail list logo
