v0.67.6 non-release

2014-02-14 Thread Sage Weil
Hi all, We built a v0.67.6 but discovered two problems shortly after it was pushed out to the public repository. We've pulled the packages from the repositories (you'll now find 0.67.5 there). We will have a v0.67.7 shortly that addresses the problem but not until we run it through its pace

Re: Master needs newer version of boost on centos?

2014-02-14 Thread Matt W. Benjamin
yarg, sorry - "Josh Durgin" wrote: > ICL was added in 1.46 according to http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/. > This also fails on debian wheezy with only 1.42 available: > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7422 > > On 02/14/2014 04:26 PM, Matt W. Benjamin wrote: > > according to google, 1.41 aho

Re: Master needs newer version of boost on centos?

2014-02-14 Thread Josh Durgin
ICL was added in 1.46 according to http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/. This also fails on debian wheezy with only 1.42 available: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7422 On 02/14/2014 04:26 PM, Matt W. Benjamin wrote: according to google, 1.41 ahould have it. - "Sage Weil" wrote: On Fri, 14 Feb

Re: Master needs newer version of boost on centos?

2014-02-14 Thread Matt W. Benjamin
according to google, 1.41 ahould have it. - "Sage Weil" wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Matt W. Benjamin wrote: > > but we haven't built on centos, to my knowledge... > > I think the question is really: is there an interval_set in boost 1.41 > > that you can use, can you use something else i

Re: Master needs newer version of boost on centos?

2014-02-14 Thread Sage Weil
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Matt W. Benjamin wrote: > but we haven't built on centos, to my knowledge... I think the question is really: is there an interval_set in boost 1.41 that you can use, can you use something else instead, or do we need to do a boost backport in order to build for centos/rhel 6.

Re: Master needs newer version of boost on centos?

2014-02-14 Thread Matt W. Benjamin
but we haven't built on centos, to my knowledge... - "Matt W. Benjamin" wrote: > oh, ok. I think they need an extra boost rpm? > > - "Sage Weil" wrote: > > > Hey Matt, > > > > This is in the libcephfs code I merged yesterday. Any ideas? > > > > Thanks! > > sage > > > > > > On Fr

Re: Master needs newer version of boost on centos?

2014-02-14 Thread Matt W. Benjamin
oh, ok. I think they need an extra boost rpm? - "Sage Weil" wrote: > Hey Matt, > > This is in the libcephfs code I merged yesterday. Any ideas? > > Thanks! > sage > > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Sandon Van Ness wrote: > > > > > The last couple builds of master have been failing on the cen

Re: Master needs newer version of boost on centos?

2014-02-14 Thread Sage Weil
Hey Matt, This is in the libcephfs code I merged yesterday. Any ideas? Thanks! sage On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Sandon Van Ness wrote: > > The last couple builds of master have been failing on the centos gitbuilder. > here is the build log: > > http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-centos6-a

Master needs newer version of boost on centos?

2014-02-14 Thread Sandon Van Ness
The last couple builds of master have been failing on the centos gitbuilder. here is the build log: http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-centos6-amd64/log.cgi?log=f47062d8a66b94743888aaea13e0766579379395 Its running into: CXX mds/Capability.lo CXX mds/Dumper.lo In file included from c

Re: Instructions to release your payment.

2014-02-14 Thread Dr.William Davies
Attention Sir, Following an application brought, seeking the release of your due payment through British bank, I am directed to inform you that the application has been approved and Natwest bank of London has been mandated to make transfer of your payment to the bank account you will nominate. Pl

Re: [PATCH 4/5] ceph: add missing init_acl() for mkdir() and atomic_open()

2014-02-14 Thread Alex Elder
On 02/14/2014 12:12 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote: > updated patch This looks OK, but I just finished reviewing a separate patch that seems to do this... One or the other. Provided you resolve that: Reviewed-by: Alex Elder > --- > From 9c517a5af5af472a0bee9c900b7df400b10f3098 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

Re: [PATCH 2/3] ceph: add acl, noacl options for cephfs mount

2014-02-14 Thread Alex Elder
On 02/13/2014 11:29 PM, Guangliang Zhao wrote: > Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao If CONFIG_CEPH_FS_POSIX_ACL is defined, the default is to have them enabled; if it is not, the default is to have it disabled. But now, whether enabled or not is possible to enable/disable them using a mount option.

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ceph: make ceph ACL for symlink inheritable

2014-02-14 Thread Alex Elder
On 02/13/2014 11:29 PM, Guangliang Zhao wrote: > Default ACL couldn't be inherited by the symlink in the > parent directory. This resolve it. This looks good to me, and it seems to be consistent with what other file systems do. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder > Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao > --- >

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ceph: make ceph_forget_all_cached_acls() static inline

2014-02-14 Thread Alex Elder
On 02/13/2014 11:29 PM, Guangliang Zhao wrote: > Signed-off-by: Guangliang Zhao Looks good. Is there a reason we can't just call forget_all_cached_acls(inode) directly? Or is it just so that we have our own complete private ACL interface? (I have no problem with it, just asking.) Reviewed-by: