Ian,
Yes I’ve seen it, however it only installs Ceph.
Cheers.
Sébastien Han
Cloud Engineer
"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood.”
Phone: +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72
Mail: sebastien@enovance.com
Address : 11 bis, rue Roquépine - 75008 Paris
Web : www.enovance.com - Twitter : @en
Hi John,
I'd like to draft a user guide for erasure coded pools, oriented toward system
administrators. Where do you advise me to insert this ? Should I get
inspiration from an example ?
Thanks in advance for any pointers or advice :-)
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
signature.asc
On 03/02/2014 08:07 PM, Shu, Xinxin wrote:
Hi all,
This patch added rocksdb support for ceph, enabled rocksdb for omap directory.
Rocksdb source code can be get from link. To use use rocksdb, C++11 standard
should be enabled, gcc version >= 4.7 is required to get C++11 support. Rocksdb
can
On 03/03/2014 02:20 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi John,
I'd like to draft a user guide for erasure coded pools, oriented toward system
administrators. Where do you advise me to insert this ? Should I get
inspiration from an example ?
the docs dir isn't good for that? If not, might be that the
I had been working on something similar to Seb's. Alfredo's (which I
had looked at before) seems to be a wrapper around ceph-deploy.
Useful, but not as fully featured. It also hasn't been updated in 7
months.
I would certainly like to see a more fully-featured set of Ansible
playbooks in Ceph's
Doing rbd_obj_request_put() in rbd_img_request_fill() error paths is
not only insufficient, but also triggers an rbd_assert() in
rbd_obj_request_destroy():
Assertion failure in rbd_obj_request_destroy() at line 1867:
rbd_assert(obj_request->img_request == NULL);
rbd_img_obj_request_add() adds obj
On 03/03/2014 15:47, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 02:20 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I'd like to draft a user guide for erasure coded pools, oriented toward
>> system administrators. Where do you advise me to insert this ? Should I get
>> inspiration from an example ?
-- All Branches --
Alfredo Deza
2013-09-27 10:33:52 -0400 wip-5900
2014-01-21 16:29:22 -0500 wip-6465
Dan Mick
2013-07-16 23:00:06 -0700 wip-5634
2014-02-12 23:29:28 -0800 wip-no-version
2014-02-18 13:07:32 -0800 wip-7463
2014-02-27 17:2
On 03/03/2014 04:35 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 03/03/2014 15:47, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 03/03/2014 02:20 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi John,
I'd like to draft a user guide for erasure coded pools, oriented toward system
administrators. Where do you advise me to insert this ? Should I get
Hey guys, I'm terribly sorry but apparently this got stuck in my draft
mailbox for 3 months. Since we've been running this on both our test /
prod clusters I would say this is sufficiently tested.
I've looked at the code and tested this for a week now on test cluster
and it looks good. It does fix
Gents,
Enjoy. Ready for PR’s.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible
Ian R. Colle
Director of Engineering
Inktank
Delivering the Future of Storage
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ircolle
http://www.twitter.com/ircolle
Cell: +1.303.601.7713
Email: i...@inktank.com
On 3/3/14, 8:30 AM, "Travis Rhoden"
Thanks a lot Ian, here we go https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/1 :)
Sébastien Han
Cloud Engineer
"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood.”
Phone: +33 (0)1 49 70 99 72
Mail: sebastien@enovance.com
Address : 11 bis, rue Roquépine - 75008 Paris
Web : www.enovance.com -
Hello,
I'm Vipul, a Computer Engg. student studying in New Delhi. I've been a past
GSOC student under RTEMS last year, along with experience in working on
distributed storage systems, especially Redhat's Gluster. So, basically I have
some successful experience in contributing to Open Source and
Vipul,
Great to hear from you!
You can start here: http://www.ceph.com/docs/master/.
For the S3 API specifically http://www.ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/s3/
Background architecture docs might be of interest -
http://www.ceph.com/docs/master/architecture/
Have you looked in https://github.com/c
Hi John,
Thanks for the guidance, I'll do as you suggest.
Cheers
On 03/03/2014 21:14, John Wilkins wrote:
> Sorry Loic. I didn't see this earlier.
>
> I recommend putting it here: http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/
>
> We already have a guide for pools here:
> http://ceph.com/doc
On 03/03/2014 09:38 AM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Doing rbd_obj_request_put() in rbd_img_request_fill() error paths is
not only insufficient, but also triggers an rbd_assert() in
rbd_obj_request_destroy():
Assertion failure in rbd_obj_request_destroy() at line 1867:
rbd_assert(obj_request->img_request
Running rados bench with the default 4MB object size works fine, but
when I shrink the write size to 4K (i.e. running `rados -p data -b
4096 bench 30 write`), ceph-osd will segfault almost immediately.
Here is the segfault, and a link to the full debug uploaded using
ceph-post-file.
ceph-post-fil
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 15 of 15 defect(s)
** CID 1188299: Data race condition (MISSING_LOCK)
/mds/MDSUtility.cc: 142 in MDSUtility::handle_mds_map(MM
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> ** CID 1188299: Data race condition (MISSING_LOCK)
> /mds/MDSUtility.cc: 142 in MDSUtility::handle_mds_map(MMDSMap *)()
Is there a trick to getting coverity to realise that the lock is held,
but by the calling function? Does it recognise asse
I should have checked the tracker. Thanks Neil :-)
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7548#note-1
On 03/03/2014 23:32, Neil Levine wrote:
> Loic, feel free to grab http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7548
>
> The wiki is probably better for "opinionated" guides (preferred
> architectures, tuning tweaks
Hi Sebastien,
Good seeing you last week in Frankfurt!
I meant to follow up earlier (or hack on this a bit myself) but haven't
had time. After taking a look, my wish list here would be:
- simplify the 'bytes' info to just be bytes.
- maybe prefix these all with 'num_'
- for crush_types, make
Then it seems that Coverity is only able to perform intra-procedure
check, is there any inter-procedure check option to turn on?
On 2014/3/4 6:53, John Spray wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
** CID 1188299: Data race condition (MISSING_LOCK)
/mds/MDSUtility.cc: 142 i
>>Performance Test
>>Attached file is the performance comparison of rocksdb and leveldb on four
>>nodes with 40 osds, using 'rados bench' as the test tool. The performance
>>results is quite promising.
Thanks for your work, indeed performance seem to be promising !
>>Any comments or suggestio
23 matches
Mail list logo
