Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with
Coverity Scan.
77 new defect(s) introduced to ceph found with Coverity Scan.
74 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the
recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New defect(s)
Hi,
some news:
I have applied patches succefully on top of 3.18-rc1 kernel.
But don't seem to help is my case.
(I think that blk-mq is working because I don't see any io schedulers on rbd
devices, as blk-mq don't support them actually).
My main problem is that I can't reach more than around
Hi Yuri,
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/commit/3b4442a2014200222764e7fce0cb9c343d97efde
points to
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/dumpling/qa/workunits/rados/test-upgrade-firefly.sh
however, because the client was upgraded, the ceph_test_rados_api_aio binary
being run is the firefly
Alexandre,
Have you tried mapping different images on the same m/c with 'noshare' map
option ?
If not, it will not scale with increasing number of images (and thus mapped
rbds) on a single m/c as they will share the same connection to cluster.
Thanks Regards
Somnath
-Original Message-
subscribe ceph-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Sage,
Leveldb version is 1.17.
Thanks
Prashanth
-Original Message-
From: Sage Weil [mailto:s...@newdream.net]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 6:11 PM
To: Philip Kufeldt
Cc: Prashanth Nednoor; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Having issues trying to get the OSD up on a
Sage,
Good news, I am able to create the OSD successfully, let's see what's in store
next.
It was an issue with leveldb1.17 not having either memory barrier or atomic
operation support for DEBIAN MIPS???
Not even the latest version leveldb1.18 I pulled from
Hi,
I agree with you this is a bug.
I think we should change the following code:
// KISS: if [lower,upper] spans our target effort, evict it.
if (atime_lower = agent_state-evict_effort)
return false;
to something like this:
if (100 - atime_upper =
