Hi Sage,
I tried to integrate wip-auth into my 0.91 build environment.
I had not been able to start the cluster successfully: ceph-mon
crashes with a segmentation fault in CryptoKey::encrypt()
(see attachment).
This happens when linking with libnss or libcryptopp (version 5.6.2).
I created the
Hi Mark,
do you have a recorded video of the meeting ?
I'm seeing some discussions about ssd benchmark in etherpad,
as I'm going to do some big benchs next month, I'm interested ;)
- Mail original -
De: "Mark Nelson"
À: "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Mercredi 28 Janvier 2015 16:12:38
Objet: 0
Hi Chris,
For metadata overhead, we need to resolve it at upper level,
keyvaluestore won't add extra metadata in normal io except rarely
header save which only update when header changed.
As for active write, why do you think it there only one active write
in keyvaluestore threads? I just check r
Hello, marcel,
Below is the email sent to the ceph-users mail list regarding ceph
class question, but seems it's in pending state since I am not the
member of that list.
>>
Hello,
I found the document of ceph class usage is very few, below is the
only one which can almost address my needs--
http:
Hello Dennis,
I haven't dived into librados code yet, but as far as I can see it is a
couple of layers above what I wrote about. :/
Can you please concretize your question a bit?
~marcel
Dennis Chen writes:
> Hello marcel,
>
> Very good article though I am still reading it. Do you have a cle
Hi Chris,
[Moving this thread to ceph-devel, which is probably a bit more
appropriate.]
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Chris Pacejo wrote:
> Hi, we've been experimenting with the keyvaluestore backend, and have found
> that, on every object write (e.g. with `rados put`), a single transaction is
> issued c
Hi Yujie,
I've rebased your congruential crush series on top of the other recent
CRUSH changes (mainly straw2 buckets) and made a few small changes and
cleanups. Can you please take a look and see if I may have
missed anything? It would also be helpful if you could verify that the
final vers
Yehuda Sadeh writes:
[..]
>
> I just set it to get backported for firefly and giant.
>
> Thanks,
> Yehuda
>
Thanks!!
Regards
--
Abhishek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Abhishek L
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Valery Tschopp writes:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> We have integrated our radosgw (v0.80.7) with our OpenStack Keystone
>> server (icehouse) successfully.
>>
>> The "normal" S3 operations can be executed with the Keystone user's EC2
>> credential
I was going to do a proplist arg type thing? I'll adapt it until hopefully
shared happiness breaks out...
Matt
- "Sage Weil" wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > - "Sage Weil" wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> > > > Hi,
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> - "Sage Weil" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm looking at ways to pass potentially messenger-specific options
> > > through the Messenger factory. The immediate parameter I need to
>
There is obvious overlap with policy, but policy is currently not well
structured for this use.
Changing or extending the policy interface seemed plausible, but also seemed
likely to run into more objections.
Matt
- "Haomai Wang" wrote:
> I think it may better that Messenger impl can intro
Hi
Valery Tschopp writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> We have integrated our radosgw (v0.80.7) with our OpenStack Keystone
> server (icehouse) successfully.
>
> The "normal" S3 operations can be executed with the Keystone user's EC2
> credentials (EC2_ACCESS_KEY, EC2_SECRET_KEY). The radosgw correctly
> ha
I think it may better that Messenger impl can introspect itself by
"type", "policy", config and related infos?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> - "Sage Weil" wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm looking at ways to
Hi,
- "Sage Weil" wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking at ways to pass potentially messenger-specific options
> through the Messenger factory.
> > The immediate parameter I need to provide is the number of Accelio
> portals to set up (this should
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at ways to pass potentially messenger-specific options through
> the Messenger factory.
> The immediate parameter I need to provide is the number of Accelio portals to
> set up (this should
> vary by Messenger instance), but I ex
Hi,
I'm looking at ways to pass potentially messenger-specific options through the
Messenger factory.
The immediate parameter I need to provide is the number of Accelio portals to
set up (this should
vary by Messenger instance), but I expect others will be needed in future. I
don't think this
Hi guys,
We have integrated our radosgw (v0.80.7) with our OpenStack Keystone
server (icehouse) successfully.
The "normal" S3 operations can be executed with the Keystone user's EC2
credentials (EC2_ACCESS_KEY, EC2_SECRET_KEY). The radosgw correctly
handles these user credentials, ask keysto
Hi,
It looks good and ready for integration testing :-) I just created
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10686 to track this feature. Since we are late
in development cycle and unless someone has a different opinion, I will mark
the SHEC plugin as experimental so people know it's new. I will howev
Hi Loic,
When I reset our commits on our fork repository, the 1st pull request was
automatically closed.
So, I have issued another pull request of mSHEC.
mSHEC : multiple Shingled Erasure Code #3534
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3534
As a result, I believe I have squashed our commits into o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Mark
On 28/01/15 21:51, Mark Nelson wrote:
> Per Sage's suggestion in the perf meeting this morning I dumped
> sysctl -a on both systems and wrote a little script to compare an
> arbitrary number of sysctl output files. It only lists settings
>
Hi David,
I see you created a pull requests for backporting documentation to firefly
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3521
And also three issues to track the backport on firefly, giant and future hammer:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10676 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10677
http://tracker.
Hello marcel,
Very good article though I am still reading it. Do you have a clear
picture of the relationship between class and
librados API - rados_exec()?
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Marcel Lauhoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wrote an article about the object store API - How it works and looks
>
23 matches
Mail list logo