Re: teuthology-lock and choosing a kernel

2015-03-10 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > I successfully installed a 3.19 kernel (details at > http://dachary.org/?p=3594). It turns out that the loop module is compiled in > and defaults to having zero partitions allowed by default. Since I was > looking for a solut

Re: giant integration branch for v0.87.1 ready for QE / fix for 10433/8011 ? osd/ReplicatedPG.cc: 5545: FAILED assert(soid < scrubber.start || soid >= scrubber.end)

2015-03-10 Thread Laurent GUERBY
Hi, Any reason why the complete fix for 8011/10433 was not included in giant 0.87.1? Missing fix: http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/9b26de3f3653d38dcdfc5b97874089f19d2a59d7 Issues: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8011 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10433#note-7 Thanks in advance, Si

Re: teuthology-lock and choosing a kernel

2015-03-10 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi Ilya, On 10/03/2015 08:19, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> I successfully installed a 3.19 kernel (details at >> http://dachary.org/?p=3594). It turns out that the loop module is compiled >> in and defaults to having zero partiti

Re: giant integration branch for v0.87.1 ready for QE / fix for 10433/8011 ? osd/ReplicatedPG.cc: 5545: FAILED assert(soid < scrubber.start || soid >= scrubber.end)

2015-03-10 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi Laurent, http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8011 is now marked with a higher priority for backporting (I'm using the "Severity" field for that purpose). Please let me know if other backports need more attention. Cheers On 10/03/2015 07:56, Laurent GUERBY wrote: > Hi, > > Any reason why the com

Re: Merging hammer in master: conflict on gmock

2015-03-10 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi Danny, On 10/03/2015 06:59, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote: > Am 10.03.2015 um 00:06 schrieb Loic Dachary: >> >> >> On 09/03/2015 18:31, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote: >>> Hi Loic, >>> >>> this one is a tricky one. I didn't find a smooth/automatic >>> solution yet. >>> >>> This seems to work: >>> >>> git checkout m

RE: conditions for removing experimental feature marks

2015-03-10 Thread Miyamae, Takeshi
Dear Loic, I really apologize that our reply is too late. Since removing experimental flag from SHEC at v0.94 is our immediate hope, we should have started any actions for that earlier. By the way, you mean we must add just the same workaround as 10887 for SHEC if our target is Hammer. Is my und

Re: Merging hammer in master: conflict on gmock

2015-03-10 Thread Danny Al-Gaaf
Am 10.03.2015 um 09:02 schrieb Loic Dachary: > Hi Danny, > > On 10/03/2015 06:59, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote: >> Am 10.03.2015 um 00:06 schrieb Loic Dachary: [...] >>> >>> Do you know what changes have been done in hammer in src/gmock >>> ? >> >> It seems as if there was no change to src/gmock in hamme

Re: conditions for removing experimental feature marks

2015-03-10 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi ! On 10/03/2015 11:35, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote: > Dear Loic, > > I really apologize that our reply is too late. > Since removing experimental flag from SHEC at v0.94 is our immediate hope, we > should > have started any actions for that earlier. No worries, it's never too late to do good :-)

[PATCH] ceph: match wait_for_completion_timeout return type

2015-03-10 Thread Nicholas Mc Guire
return type of wait_for_completion_timeout is unsigned long not int. An appropriately named unsigned long is added and the assignment fixed up. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire --- This was only compile tested for x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_CEPH_FS=m Patch is against 4.0-rc2 linux-next (localver

ceph v0.80.9 debian source packages???

2015-03-10 Thread Valery Tschopp
Hi guys, The last trusty version 0.80.9 have been pushed in the "deb http://ceph.com/debian-firefly/ trusty main" repository yesterday. The last packages have the version 0.80.9-1trusty, but I can not find the corresponding source packages in http://gitbuilder.ceph.com/ceph-deb-trusty-x86_64

v0.80.9 Firefly released

2015-03-10 Thread Sage Weil
This is a bugfix release for firefly. It fixes a performance regression in librbd, an important CRUSH misbehavior (see below), and several RGW bugs. We have also backported support for flock/fcntl locks to ceph-fuse and libcephfs. We recommend that all Firefly users upgrade. For more detaile

RE: wip-auth

2015-03-10 Thread Blinick, Stephen L
Hi -- was running some baselines on 0.93 and wanted to check, will wip-auth changes go into Hamer or in a later release? (Sorry if I missed the discussion in one of the perf meetings last month) Thanks, Stephen -Original Message- From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-d

RE: wip-auth

2015-03-10 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Blinick, Stephen L wrote: > Hi -- was running some baselines on 0.93 and wanted to check, will > wip-auth changes go into Hamer or in a later release? (Sorry if I > missed the discussion in one of the perf meetings last month) It will go in after hammer. We can backport as

[PATCH V6 1/5] Build support for BlkKin (LTTng + Zipkin) tracing

2015-03-10 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
* Adds --with-blkin to autoconf (default without) * Adds BLKIN_LIBS to necessary automake files * Adds documentation for testing BlkKin tracing * Adds ztrace initialization Signed-off-by: Andrew Shewmaker Signed-off-by: Marios-Evaggelos Kogias Signed-off-by: Chendi.Xue --- configure.ac

[no subject]

2015-03-10 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
The following patches are based on the work of Marios Kogias, first posted in August. http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg19890.html This patch is against HEAD as of March 10th, commit 5d5b510810e96503b9323b010149f7bd5b45db7c. It can also be found at https://github.com/agshew/ceph/tree/wip-b

[PATCH V6 3/5] OSD support for blkin (LTTng + Zipkin) tracing

2015-03-10 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
* Adds tracing for OSDs and Placement Groups, specifically: messages for OSD operations, FileJournal, FileStore, ECBackend, replication, and traced versions of Objecter read/write (only basic read/write functions). * Moves global_init_daemonize() earlier in ceph_osd.c:main Signed-off-by

[PATCH V6 2/5] Initial support for blkin (LTTng + Zipkin) tracing

2015-03-10 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
* Adds conditional build support. * Adds BLKIN_* macro wrappers to reduce need for ifdef WITH_BLKIN. * Adds blkin header include. * Adds message infrastructure for blkin tracing. * Adds blkin trace events and keyvals to OpTracker. * Adds osd, pg, journal, and filestore blkin traces to OpTrack

[PATCH V6 4/5] Rados support for blkin (LTTng + Zipkin) tracing

2015-03-10 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
* Adds traced versions of Rados aio_read/write Signed-off-by: Marios-Evaggelos Kogias Signed-off-by: Filippos Giannakos Signed-off-by: Andrew Shewmaker Signed-off-by: Chendi.Xue --- include/rados/librados.h | 13 ++ librados/IoCtxImpl.cc| 91 ++

[PATCH V6 5/5] Rados example for blkin (LTTng + Zipkin) tracing

2015-03-10 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
This code is Marios', with the following exceptions: * split out example from other tracing changes * changed name of example * whitespace issues have been fixed * Makefile cleans up the new example Signed-off-by: Marios-Evaggelos Kogias Signed-off-by: Filippos Giannakos Signed-off-by: Andre

Re: FileStore performance: coalescing operations

2015-03-10 Thread Ning Yao
Can we also consider to coalesce two OP_SETATTR transaction to a single OP_SETATTRS transaction? Regards Ning Yao 2015-03-05 15:04 GMT+08:00 Haomai Wang : > I think the performance improvement can be refer to > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2972 which I did a simple benchmark > comparison. >