Hello, I wish to know where to get ceph hammer for ubuntu vivid 15.04 ?
Regards
--
Alphe Salas
I.T ingeneer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-inf
Hi again,
Sam reviewed the three backports you did and approved. They have been merged
and the integration branch is now merged in firefly entirely.
git log --no-merges --oneline ceph/firefly..ceph/firefly-backports
(shows nothing)
We can begin another round of testing as soon as you have prepa
Should stretch be added as well?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Debian Jessie has been released this weekend,
>
> any plan to add jessie repositories soon ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Alexandre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-deve
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Chen, Xiaoxi wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> Really good test:) I only played a bit on SSD, the parallel WAL
> threads really helps but we still have a long way to go especially on
> all-ssd case. I tried this
> https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/master/util/env_posix.cc#L15
Hi Mark,
You may miss this tunable: newstore_sync_wal_apply, which is default
to true, but would be better to make if false.
If sync_wal_apply is true, WAL apply will be don synchronize (in
kv_sync_thread) instead of WAL thread. See
if (g_conf->newstore_sync_wal_apply) {
On 04/29/2015 03:33 AM, Chen, Xiaoxi wrote:
Hi Mark,
Really good test:) I only played a bit on SSD, the parallel WAL threads
really helps but we still have a long way to go especially on all-ssd case.
I tried this
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/master/util/env_posix.cc#L1515
On 04/29/2015 02:10 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the process of upgrading a cluster from Giant to Hammer I saw this
> on the OSD logs:
>
> 2015-04-29 14:02:37.015454 7f887875e900 -1 osd.456 43089
> set_disk_tp_priority(22) Invalid argument:
> osd_disk_thread_ioprio_class is but onl
Hi Mark,
Really good test:) I only played a bit on SSD, the parallel WAL threads
really helps but we still have a long way to go especially on all-ssd case.
I tried this
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/master/util/env_posix.cc#L1515 by
hacking the rocksdb, but the performance d
>>Still not, we currently only focus on bug fix and stable purpose.
Great (I have had some hang/crash client with benchmarking it)
>>But I think performance improvement will be pick up soon(May?), the
>>problem is clearly I think.
Ok, I'll be happy to test it.
- Mail original -
De: "
