Hello all,
Is this possible?
This email message is a private communication. The information transmitted,
including attachments, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential, privileged, and/or proprietary
material. Any review,
On 8/12/15 10:04 AM, Chen, Xiaoxi wrote:
That require some kind of driver in Ceph(see XFSFileStoreBackend.cc/h and
BTRFSFileStoreBackend.cc/h), you need to implement a GPFSFileStoreBackend in
Ceph.
But Why you want OSD on top of GPFS?
I understand it seems redundant.
-Original
That require some kind of driver in Ceph(see XFSFileStoreBackend.cc/h and
BTRFSFileStoreBackend.cc/h), you need to implement a GPFSFileStoreBackend in
Ceph.
But Why you want OSD on top of GPFS?
-Original Message-
From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel-
The infernalis feature freeze is coming up Real Soon Now. I've marked
some of the pull requests on github that I would like to see merged.
Please take a look:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3Ainfernalis
Ideally we should focus our testing efforts on
I hope this PR could be pushed to I :-) It seemed waited so long.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3595
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
The infernalis feature freeze is coming up Real Soon Now. I've marked
some of the pull requests on github that I would
Hi Sage,
Hope these two get a chance, they are both straightforward, and
useful for cache tiering.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5362
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5473
Cheers,
Li Wang
On 2015/8/13 5:20, Sage Weil wrote:
The infernalis feature freeze is coming up Real Soon Now. I've
From: Kent Overstreet kent.overstr...@gmail.com
As generic_make_request() is now able to handle arbitrarily sized bios,
it's no longer necessary for each individual block driver to define its
own -merge_bvec_fn() callback. Remove every invocation completely.
Cc: Jens Axboe ax...@kernel.dk
Cc:
Haomai,
Yes, one of the goals is to make async read xattr..
IMO, this scheme should benefit in the following scenario..
Ops within a PG will not be serialized any more as long as it is not coming on
the same object and this could be a big win.
In our workload at least we are not seeing the
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Somnath Roy somnath@sandisk.com wrote:
Haomai,
Yes, one of the goals is to make async read xattr..
IMO, this scheme should benefit in the following scenario..
Ops within a PG will not be serialized any more as long as it is not coming
on the same object
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 03/08/2015 21:18, John Spray wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Ceph,
We require that each commit has a Signed-off-by line with the name and
email of the author. The
On 12/08/2015 12:54, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 03/08/2015 21:18, John Spray wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Ceph,
We require that each commit has a Signed-off-by line with
Meeting is canceled this week due to the Ceph Hackathon. See you next
week guys!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
12 matches
Mail list logo
