Huh..One update :
Earlier I didn't use any compiler optimization, now with O2 I got this..
# Test conventional ptr ##
start: 1449126917 secs, 565820 usecs
end: 1449126940 secs, 227713 usecs
micros_used for conventional ptr: 22661893
# Test Unique Smart ptr ##
start: 1449126940 s
thanks! Fixed in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6783. plz review
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:19 AM, James (Fei) Liu-SSI
wrote:
> Hi Haomai,
>I happened to run ceph_objectstore_bench against key value store on master
> branch. It always crashed at finisher_thread_entry :
> assert(!ls_rval.e
On 12/01/2015 04:44 AM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> So I go to http://ceph.com and click on the "Documentation" link. In the
> HTML source code the linked URL is http://ceph.com/docs but the HTTP
> server rewrites this to:
>
> http://docs.ceph.com/docs/v0.80.5/
>
> Could someone arrange for this to be
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Somnath Roy wrote:
> Hi Sage/Sam,
> As discussed in today's performance meeting , I am planning to change the
> queue_transactions() interface to the following.
>
> int queue_transactions(Sequencer *osr, list& tls,
> Context *onreadable,
it will rotate every week by default, you can see the logrotate file
/etc/ceph/logrotate.d/ceph
2015-12-03 12:37 GMT+08:00 Wukongming :
> Hi ,All
> Is there anyone who knows How long or how many days will the logs.gz
> (mon/osd/mds)be kept, maybe before flushed?
>
> --
Hi ,All
Is there anyone who knows How long or how many days will the logs.gz
(mon/osd/mds)be kept, maybe before flushed?
-
wukongming ID: 12019
Tel：0571-86760239
Dept：2014 UIS2 OneStor
---
Thanks James for looking into this..
Shared_ptr used heavily in the OSD.cc/Replicated PG path..
Regards
Somnath
-Original Message-
From: James (Fei) Liu-SSI [mailto:james@ssi.samsung.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 7:50 PM
To: Somnath Roy; Sage Weil (s...@newdream.net); Samue
Hi Somnath,
Great findings. As you mentioned, unique_ptr and smart_ptr always have a well
known problem about the performance comparing to conventional pointer , Got a
chance to run your interesting code and close to what you find.
But I did not find any place in filestore/newstore (keyvaluesto
On 11/30/2015 11:57 AM, Deneau, Tom wrote:
> I did not see the source tarball for 10.0.0 at
> http://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ceph-10.0.0.tar.gz
>
It's there now, FWIW.
--
Dan Mick
Red Hat, Inc.
Ceph docs: http://ceph.com/docs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cep
*Also*, in this way we are unnecessary adding another smart pointer overhead in
the Ceph IO path.
As I communicated sometimes back (probably 2 years now :-) ) in the community,
profiler is showing these smart pointers (shared_ptr) as one of the hot spot.
Now, I decided to actually measure this..
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> On 2-12-2015 15:13, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> see https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6770. The code can be compiled
>> on FreeBSD/OSX, most client programs can connect to ceph servers on
>> Linux.
>
> Hi,
>
> I do like some of the inline compi
Hi Sage/Sam,
As discussed in today's performance meeting , I am planning to change the
queue_transactions() interface to the following.
int queue_transactions(Sequencer *osr, list& tls,
Context *onreadable, Context *ondisk=0,
Context *onreadable
Running gmake check is starting to work.
reporting still thinks there are no successful tests
but tests themselves report OKE
But where I really can not get it to work is with testing rbd.
Is starts with the simple:
/bin/sh: rbd: not found
And whatever I'm trying in co
On 1-12-2015 19:51, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> On 1-12-2015 17:24, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> I think in the short run it will not be the code that is going to be a
>> major porting pain. But getting the run-time environment ironed out is
>> just plain (hard) work. Things where /bin/sh expects
On 2-12-2015 15:13, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> see https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6770. The code can be compiled
> on FreeBSD/OSX, most client programs can connect to ceph servers on
> Linux.
Hi,
I do like some of the inline compiler tests.
I guess that the way the errno's are done like the other OS
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Paul Von-Stamwitz
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel-
>> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mark Nelson
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 11:04 AM
>> To: Gregory Farnum; Vimal
>> Cc: ceph-devel
>> S
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mark Nelson
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 11:04 AM
> To: Gregory Farnum; Vimal
> Cc: ceph-devel
> Subject: Re: Suggestions on tracker 13578
>
>
> On 12/02/2015 12
Hi Haomai,
I happened to run ceph_objectstore_bench against key value store on master
branch. It always crashed at finisher_thread_entry : assert(!ls_rval.empty());
It looks like the completion not only has null entry in the finisher queue ,
but also has none entry in the finisher_queue_r
On 12/02/2015 12:23 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Vimal wrote:
Hello,
This mail is to discuss the feature request at
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13578.
If done, such a tool should help point out several mis-configurations that
may cause problems in a cluster l
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Vimal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This mail is to discuss the feature request at
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13578.
>
> If done, such a tool should help point out several mis-configurations that
> may cause problems in a cluster later.
>
> Some of the suggestions are:
see https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6770. The code can be compiled
on FreeBSD/OSX, most client programs can connect to ceph servers on
Linux.
Regards
Yan. Zheng
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> On 1-12-2015 19:36, Sage Weil wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Alan Some
Hi,
I would appreciate to know the current status of the implementation if
possible. Any progress? Any 'deadline' to go upstream? :)
Thanks in advance!
Javier
On 07/31/2015 10:21 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I'm busy travelling and wrapping other things up, but will resume major
> work on this
Sage, thanks!
I'm missing your email until i saw it in GMANE today.
Thanks again!
2015-11-26 21:30 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil :
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, hzwulibin wrote:
>> Hi, Sage
>>
>> I has a question about min_size of pool.
>>
>> The default value of min_size is 2, but in this setting, when two OSD
23 matches
Mail list logo
