Hi all,
Created branch wip-3735 to capture Sylvain's patch.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Sylvain Munaut
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> As far as I know relying on SCRIPT_URI is rather dangerous since it's not
>> always there.
>>
>> There better should be an if/else-satement surrounding that code having it
Hey Jim,
Running the third test with tunable chooseleaf_descend_once 0 with no
devices marked out yields the following result
(999.827397, 0.48667056652539997)
so chi squared value is 999 with a corresponding p value of 0.487 so
that the placement distribution seems to be drawn from the
Hello all,
Here's what I've done to try and validate the new
chooseleaf_descend_once tunable first described in commit
f1a53c5e80a48557e63db9c52b83f39391bc69b8 in the wip-crush branch of
ceph.git.
First I set the new tunable to it's legacy value, disabled,
tunable choose_local_tries 0
tunab
t; step take default
> step chooseleaf firstn 0 type host
> step emit
> }
> rule backup {
> ruleset 3
> type replicated
> min_size 1
> max_size 10
> step take bak
> step chooseleaf firstn 0 type ho
Hello Paul,
Could you post your CRUSH map, crushtool -d
caleb
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Paul Pettigrew
> Date: Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 8:08 PM
> Subject: RE: Crush not deliverying data uniformly -> HEALTH_ERR full osd
>
