As a special use-case I would propose to do the encryption inside the
qemu-rbd driver (similar to the qcow2 driver). This would also encrypt the
network traffic from the KVM host to the osd.
I know that this is probably not the generic aproach for on disk
encryption, but it would provide some
(untested).
Christian
From 36314693f8b9be1f3c77621543adf01d7c51cb88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Brunner c...@muc.de
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:23:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] libvirt: allow migration for network protocols
Live migration should be possible with most (all ?) network
protocols
Same thing here.
I've tried really hard, but even after 12 hours I wasn't able to get a
single warning from btrfs.
I think you cracked it!
Thanks,
Christian
2012/5/24 Martin Mailand mar...@tuxadero.com:
Hi,
the ceph cluster is running under heavy load for the last 13 hours without a
2012/5/21 Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com:
Hi Josef,
On fri, 18 May 2012 15:01:05 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
index 9b9b15f..492c74f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
@@ -57,9 +57,6 @@ struct
2012/5/20 Tim O'Donovan t...@icukhosting.co.uk:
- High performance Block Storage (RBD)
Many large SATA SSDs for the storage (prbably in a RAID5 config)
stec zeusram ssd drive for the journal
How do you think standard SATA disks would perform in comparison to
this, and is a separate
2012/5/21 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG s.pri...@profihost.ag:
Am 20.05.2012 10:31, schrieb Christian Brunner:
That's exactly what i thought too but then you need a seperate ceph / rbd
cluster for each type.
Which will result in a minimum of:
3x mon servers per type
4x osd servers per type
2012/5/20 Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag:
Am 19.05.2012 18:15, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
Hi,
For your journal , if you have money, you can use
stec zeusram ssd drive. (around 2000€ /8GB / 10 iops read/write with
4k block).
I'm using them with zfs san, they rocks for journal.
2012/5/20 Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag:
Am 20.05.2012 10:19, schrieb Christian Brunner:
- Cheap Object Storage (S3):
Many 3,5'' SATA Drives for the storage (probably in a RAID config)
A small and cheap SSD for the journal
- Basic Block Storage (RBD):
Many 2,5'' SATA Drives
2012/5/18 Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com:
Hi,
I'm going to build a rados block cluster for my kvm hypervisors.
Is it already production ready ? (stable,no crash)
We are using 0.45 in production. Recent ceph versions are quite stable
(although we hat some troubles with excessive
2012/5/18 Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com:
Hi Christian,
thanks for your response.
We are using 0.45 in production. Recent ceph versions are quite stable
(although we hat some troubles with excessive logging and a full log
partition lately which caused our cluster to halt).
excessive
2012/5/17 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 05:12:55PM +0200, Martin Mailand wrote:
Hi Josef,
no there was nothing above. Here the is another dmesg output.
Hrm ok give this a try and hopefully this is it, still couldn't reproduce.
Thanks,
Josef
Well, I hate to say it,
This patch allows importing images from stdin with the following command:
rbd import --size=size in MB - [dest-image]
Signed-off-by: Christian Brunner c...@muc.de
---
src/rbd.cc | 37 +
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src
Check for empty blocks while importing an image.
When a read block only consists of zeroes, the import is simply
skipping the write. This way you non-sparse images will become sparse
rbd images.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brunner c...@muc.de
---
src/rbd.cc | 44
This patch allows importing images from stdin with the following command:
rbd import --size=size in MB - [dest-image]
v1 - v2: stat stdin as well
Signed-off-by: Christian Brunner c...@muc.de
---
src/rbd.cc | 26 +++---
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions
2012/5/3 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:38:27AM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2012 11:20:53 -0400, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:17:43AM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
Yeah all that was in the right place, I rebooted and I
2012/4/29 tsuna tsuna...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Christian Brunner
christ...@brunner-muc.de wrote:
After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again.
Performance with the current for-linux-min branch and big metadata
is much better.
I've heard
Am 24. April 2012 18:26 schrieb Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:09:34PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again.
Performance with the current for-linux-min branch
Am 20. April 2012 17:09 schrieb Christian Brunner christ...@brunner-muc.de:
After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again.
Performance with the current for-linux-min branch and big metadata
is much better. The only problem (?) I'm still seeing is a warning
that seems
This is probably going in the same direction as the report by Oliver Francke.
Ceph is reporting an inconsistent PG. Running a scrub on the PG gave
me the folling messages:
2012-03-16 12:55:17.287415 log 2012-03-16 12:55:12.179529 osd.14
10.255.0.63:6818/2014 34280 : [ERR] 2.117 osd.0: soid
Hi,
I've just updated our ceph-cluster from 0.39 to 0.42.2. Now I'm seeing
a lot of messages like these in the OSD log:
Mar 2 10:15:43 os00 osd.003[15096]: 7f0b9831c700 --
10.255.0.60:6821/15095 10.255.0.61:6812/22474 pipe(0x2e74100 sd=47
pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).connect protocol version mismatch, my 9
Libvirt is trying to set security lables even for network shares. This
will not work. I think this is fixed in newer libvirt versions. For
older versions you can try this patch:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-May/msg01446.html
Regards,
Christian
2012/2/4 Masuko Tomoya
Hi,
reading the list archives, I get the impression that XFS is the second
best alternative to btrfs. But when I start an ceph-osd on an XFS
volume, there is still a big warning:
WARNING: not btrfs or ext3. We don't currently support file systems other
than btrfs and ext3
As you might know, I have been seeing btrfs slowdowns in our ceph
cluster for quite some time. Even with the latest btrfs code for 3.3
I'm still seeing these problems. To make things reproducible, I've now
written a small test, that imitates ceph's behavior:
On a freshly created btrfs filesystem
2011/12/21 Jens Rehpöhler jens.rehpoeh...@filoo.de:
Am 19.12.2011 19:51, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Jens Rehpöhler
jens.rehpoeh...@filoo.de wrote:
Good morning !!
i got the following warning as soon as i use btrfs as underlaying
filesystem (for stability
Hi Bill,
2011/12/18 Bill Hastings bllhasti...@gmail.com:
I am trying to get my feet wet with Ceph and RADOS. My aim is to use
it as a block device for KVM instances. My understanding is that
virtual disks get striped at 1 MB boundaries by default. Does that
mean that there are going to be
Hi Florian,
live migration with rbd images usually works fine. A few recommendations:
- You should not map the image on the host, while using it in a VM
with the qemu driver.
- For testing I would remove the ISO-Image from your VM. (Not sure if
that matters).
Also I'm not using cephx
2011/11/15 Andreas Dilger adil...@whamcloud.com:
Coincidentally, we have someone working in those patches again. The main
obstacle for accepting the previous patch as-is was that Ted wanted to add
support for medium-sized xattrs that are addressed as a string of blocks,
instead of via an
2011/12/5 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
Hi Christian,
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
I've just updated to 0.39. Everything seems to be fine, except one
minor thing I noticed:
'ceph -w' output stops after a few minutes. With debug ms = 1 it
ends with these lines:
2011-12-05
I've just updated to 0.39. Everything seems to be fine, except one
minor thing I noticed:
'ceph -w' output stops after a few minutes. With debug ms = 1 it
ends with these lines:
2011-12-05 14:45:52.939300 7fc700637700 -- 10.255.0.21:0/14145 ==
mon.2 10.255.0.22:6789/0 315
I'm running a btrfs-debug patch on one of our nodes. This patch prints
calls to btrfs_orphan_add. I'm still waiting for the problem the patch
was intended to trace, but in the logs I found something ceph related
I don't understand:
When I look at the btrfs_orphan_add messages there is one inode
write to the PG. I'm surprised
that one PG has so much more activity than the others, but that's why
that inode has so much activity.
What are you doing with this installation, and roughly how many PGs
are on the node?
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Christian Brunner c...@muc.de wrote:
I'm
Sorry, just one more question:
Why is pginfo truncated every time a write is performed to the PG?
Thanks,
Christian
2011/11/24 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
Hmmm, OK. - This really seems to belong to one virtual machine, that
is writing to a single object over and over again.
Thanks
2011/11/24 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
Sorry, just one more question:
Why is pginfo truncated every time a write is performed to the PG?
Forget about my question.
Sorry for the noise,
Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body
Reading the latest pull request by Chris Mason, I was wondering about
the recommended mount options for an OSD-Filesystem.
In the past I came across the following btrfs options, that were used
in conjunction with ceph:
- nodatacow: To avoid fragmentation. I think this one makes sense when
you
] ---[ end trace 6f256945fc353904 ]---
To aid debuging, I can also send you an ftrace with btrfs events and
function_graph enabled. Just tell me if you need it.
Thanks,
Christian
2011/11/13 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
Hi Josef,
I've patched one of our ceph nodes with the stuff in your master repo
Hi Josef,
I've patched one of our ceph nodes with the stuff in your master repo
(including lxo's patches).
The WARNING in inode.c seems to be gone now, but load is still going
up after a day.
Another thing I've witnessed is that I'm getting a new warning, when I
umount the filesystem (see
2011/11/11 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
Hi Christian,
Do you have a core file? Can you dump the thread stack traces so we can
see if it got hung up on a syscall or somewhere internally (thread apply
all bt)?
I'm not sure if it's from btrfs, but ther is no kernel warning at that time.
I'm
2011/10/27 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:56:48PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/10/24 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
[adding linux-btrfs to cc]
Josef, Chris, any ideas on the below issues
2011/10/26 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
Christian, have you tweaked those settings in your ceph.conf? It would
be
something like 'journal dio = false'. If not, can you verify that
directio shows true when the journal is initialized from
2011/10/26 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
2011/10/25 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:15:45PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:05:12AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
Attached
Here is another problem I've seen. Unfortunatly I do not have any
debug output and it's not reproduceable.
While removing an image with rbd rm I noticed that rbd stopped
making progress. When I looked with ceph -w I saw a PG, that was in
state active+clean+scrubbing:
2011-10-25 14:01:34.198961
2011/10/25 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:56:48PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/10/24 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
[adding linux-btrfs to cc]
Josef, Chris, any ideas on the below issues
2011/10/25 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/10/25 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:56:48PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
[...]
In our Ceph-OSD server we have 4 disks with 4 btrfs filesystems
2011/10/25 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Josef Bacik wrote:
At this point it seems like the biggest problem with latency in ceph-osd
is not related to btrfs, the latency seems to all be from the fact that
ceph-osd is fsyncing a block dev for whatever reason.
There is one
2011/10/25 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:15:45PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:05:12AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Christian Brunner wrote:
Attached is a perf-report. I have included the whole
Thanks for explaining this. I don't have any objections against btrfs
as a osd filesystem. Even the fact that there is no btrfs-fsck doesn't
scare me, since I can use the ceph replication to recover a lost
btrfs-filesystem. The only problem I have is, that btrfs is not stable
on our side and I
2011/10/24 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:51:47PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:06:49AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
[adding linux-btrfs to cc]
Josef, Chris, any ideas on the below issues?
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Christian Brunner wrote
When I want to delete a snapshot, everything is working, but there is
a strange error message:
# rbd create --size=100 image
# rbd snap create --snap=image-snap1 image
# rbd snap ls image
8 image-snap1 104857600
# rbd snap rm --snap=image-snap1 image
2011-10-21 11:35:58.506393
2011/10/15 Martin Mailand mar...@tuxadero.com:
Hi Christian,
I have a very similar experience, I also used josef's tree and btrfs snaps =
0, the next problem I had than was excessive fragmentation, so I used this
patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfsm=131495014823121w=2, and changed the
, schrieb Christian Brunner:
Our bugreport with RedHat didn't make any progress for a long time,
but last week RedHat made two sugestions:
- If you configure ceph with 'filestore flusher = false', do you see
any different behavior?
- If you mount with -o noauto_da_alloc does it change anything
I'm not seeing the same problem, but I've experienced something similar:
As you might know, I had serious performance problems with btrfs some
month ago, after that, I switched to ext4 and had other problems
there. Last Saturday I decided to give josef's current btrfs git repo
a try in our ceph
I think this is related to the sync issues. You could try the josef's git tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-work.git
Since yesterday I'm using it in our ceph cluster and it seems to do a
better job.
Regards,
Christian
2011/10/9 Martin Mailand mar...@tuxadero.com:
Here is another one...
I've now run mkcephfs and started importing all our data from a
backup. However after two days, two of our OSDs are crashing right
after the start again.
It all started with a hit suicide timeout. Now I can't start it any
longer. Here is what I have in the logs. I'm
Maybe this one is easier:
One of our OSDs isn't starting, because ther is no current
directory. What I have are three snap directories.
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 37 Oct 9 15:57 ceph_fsid
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root8 Oct 9 15:57 fsid
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 21 Oct 9 15:57 magic
2011/10/11 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
Maybe this one is easier:
One of our OSDs isn't starting, because ther is no current
directory. What I have are three snap directories.
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 37 Oct 9 15:57 ceph_fsid
-rw-r--r
2011/10/11 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/10/11 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
Maybe this one is easier:
One of our OSDs isn't starting, because ther is no current
directory. What I have
Hi,
I've upgraded ceph from 0.32 to 0.36 yesterday. Now I have a totaly
screwed ceph cluster. :(
What bugs me most is the fact, that OSDs become unresponsive
frequently. The process is eating a lot of cpu and I can see the
following messages in the log:
Oct 8 22:30:05 os00 osd.000[31688]:
2011/8/25 Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub yehuda.sa...@dreamhost.com:
+ if (buf) {
+ dif = ofs-lastofs;
+ if (dif 0) {
+ byte *tempbuf = (byte *) malloc(dif);
+ memset(tempbuf, 0, dif);
+ Hash-Update((const byte *) tempbuf, dif);
+ free(tempbuf);
+ }
+
+
2011/8/26 Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub yehud...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Christian Brunner c...@muc.de wrote:
+static int hash_read_cb(uint64_t ofs, size_t len, const char *buf, void
*arg)
+{
+ ceph::crypto::Digest *Hash = (ceph::crypto::Digest *)arg;
+ byte *hashbuf = (byte
2011/8/26 Tommi Virtanen tommi.virta...@dreamhost.com:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:25, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub yehud...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Tommi Virtanen
tommi.virta...@dreamhost.com wrote:
e.g. 8kB at a time. And at that point you might as well just use read
We needed to get an md5 checksum of an rbd image. Since librbd is using a
lot of sparse operations, this was not possible without writing an image
to a local disk.
With this patch exporting the image is no longer needed. You can do
rbd md5 image and you will get the same output as you would call
This patch extends the ceph crypto classes:
- map CryptoPP::HashTransformation to ceph::crypto::Digest (for cryptopp)
- add DigestSize() to ceph::crypto::Digest (for libnss)
Thanks,
Christian
---
src/common/ceph_crypto.h |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
We needed to get an md5 checksum of an rbd image. Since librbd is using a
lot of sparse operations, this was not possible without writing an image
to a local disk.
With this patch exporting the image is no longer needed. You can do
rbd md5 image and you will get the same output as you would call
We needed to get an md5 checksum of an rbd image. Since librbd is using a
lot of sparse operations, this was not possible without writing an image
to a local disk.
With this patch exporting the image is no longer needed. You can do
rbd md5 image and you will get the same output as you would call
Hi Sage,
I saw your patches in the git repository and have now tested them.
Everything is looking good so far.
Thanks,
Christian
2011/8/19 Tommi Virtanen tommi.virta...@dreamhost.com:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:46, Christian Brunner c...@muc.de wrote:
I tried using rbd snapshots for the first
also provide an e2image with the metadata and the strace output
of the cosd, if this would be helpful.
Regards,
Christian
2011/8/8 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
I tried 3.0.1 today, which contains the commit Theodore suggested and
was no longer able to reproduce the problem.
So I think
Christian
2011/8/8 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
Hi Christian,
Are you still seeing this slowness?
sage
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/7/25 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com:
Excerpts from Christian Brunner's message of 2011-07-25 03:54:47 -0400:
Hi,
we are running
, Christian Brunner c...@muc.de wrote:
...
I tried to reproduce this without ceph, but wasn't able to...
In the meantime it seams, that I can also see the side effects on the
librbd side: I get an librbd: data error! when I do an rbd copy.
When I look at the librbd code this is related
2011/8/1 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Jul 31, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
This is link(2)
2011-07-31 23:06:50.114316 7f23c048c700 filestore(/osd.0)
collection_remove
temp/1000483.05d6/head = 0
This is unlink(2)
2011/8/1 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
yehuda.sa...@dreamhost.com wrote:
The osd first sends the ack when it receives the request
Actually it sends an ack when the request is applied in-memory to
This is also reproducable with a RHEL6.1 kernel (2.6.32-131.6.1.el6.x86_64). :(
Regards,
Christian
2011/7/30 Fyodor Ustinov u...@ufm.su:
fail. Epic fail.
Absolutely reproducible.
I have ceph cluster with this configuration:
8 physical servers
14 osd servers.
Each osd server have
2011/7/30 Theodore Tso ty...@mit.edu:
P.S Ext4 in the RHEL 6.x kernel is I believe a technology
preview, which means it might not get full support from
Red Hat. Still, if you do see those sorts of problems with
ext4 on a RHEL kernel, and you have a valid Red Hat
support contract, I'd
I shifted all my data to new filesystems. I did this, by using the
ceph replication.
During that process other cosd processes (those who had to send the
replication data) died several times. I was able to restart them, but
I think this should not happen.
Here is one log message... (they all
2011/7/28 Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com:
Christian,
Have you checked up on the disks themselves and hardware? High
utilization can mean that the i/o load has increased, but it can also
mean that the i/o capacity has decreased. Your traces seem to
indicate that a good portion of the
We are having quite some problems with the underlying filesystem for
the cosd's and I would like to hear about other experiences. Here is
what we have gone through so far:
btrfs with 2.6.38:
- good performance
- frequently hitting of various BUG_ON conditions
btrfs with 2.6.39:
- big
,
Christian
2011/7/26 Christian Brunner c...@muc.de:
Another kernel crash another invalid ceph state...
A memory allocation failure in the kernel (ixgbe) of one OSD-Server
lead to a domino effect in our ceph cluster with 0 up, 0 in.
When I restarted the cluster everything came up again. But I
Hi,
we are running a ceph cluster with btrfs as it's base filesystem
(kernel 3.0). At the beginning everything worked very well, but after
a few days (2-3) things are getting very slow.
When I look at the object store servers I see heavy disk-i/o on the
btrfs filesystems (disk utilization is
On 07/19/2011 08:41 AM, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/7/18 Sage Weils...@newdream.net:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
$ ceph pg dump -o - | grep crashed
pg_stat objects mip degr unf kb bytes log
disklog state v reported up acting
2011/7/18 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
$ ceph pg dump -o - | grep crashed
pg_stat objects mip degr unf kb bytes log
disklog state v reported up acting last_scrub
1.1ac 0 0 0 0
2011/7/13 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On 07/12/2011 11:20 AM, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/6/7 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On 06/06/2011 09:39 PM, Miao Xie wrote:
On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box
2011/6/7 Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com:
On 06/06/2011 09:39 PM, Miao Xie wrote:
On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box
This is because use_block_rsv() is having to do a
reserve_metadata_bytes(), which shouldn't
I'm sorry. At the moment I don't have a core file available and my
colleagues don't allow me to reproduce it. ;-)
We should get a new server in one or two weeks. I will try to get a core then.
Christian
2011/5/24 Josh Durgin josh.dur...@dreamhost.com:
On 05/09/2011 01:59 AM, Christian Brunner
Apart from two cosmetic issues (see below), I think this patch is
ready to replace the old rbd driver. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Christian Brunner c...@muc.de
Regards
Christian
2011/5/24 Josh Durgin josh.dur...@dreamhost.com:
librbd stacks on top of librados to provide access
to rbd images
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Christian Brunner c...@muc.de
2011/5/24 Josh Durgin josh.dur...@dreamhost.com:
The new format is
rbd:pool/image[@snapshot][:option1=value1[:option2=value2...]]
Each option is used to configure rados, and may be any Ceph option, or conf.
The conf option
--
From: Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com
Date: 2011/5/23
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/rbd: Remove unused local variable
To: c...@muc.de
Cc: QEMU Developers qemu-de...@nongnu.org
Am 23.05.2011 11:01, schrieb Christian Brunner:
2011/5/22 Stefan Weil w...@mail.berlios.de:
Am 07.05.2011 22:15
2011/5/2 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Mon, 2 May 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
after a series of hardware defects, I have a corrupted ceph cluster:
2011-05-02 18:12:31.038446 pg v8171648: 3712 pgs: 26 active, 3663
active+clean, 5 crashed+peering, 18 active+clean+inconsistent; 547 GB
Hi,
after a series of hardware defects, I have a corrupted ceph cluster:
2011-05-02 18:12:31.038446pg v8171648: 3712 pgs: 26 active, 3663
active+clean, 5 crashed+peering, 18 active+clean+inconsistent; 547 GB
data, 388 GB used, 51922 GB / 78245 GB avail; 2410/284300 degraded
(0.848%)
Now I
2011/2/2 Gregory Farnum gr...@hq.newdream.net:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
When I mentioned allocation bitmap before, I meant simply a bitmap
specifying whether the block exists, that would let us avoid looking for
an object in the parent image. In its
...@hq.newdream.net
Signed-off-by: Christian Brunner c...@muc.de
---
Makefile.objs |1 +
block/rbd.c | 1059 +
block/rbd_types.h | 71
configure | 52 +++
4 files changed, 1183 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
2010/12/6 Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com:
Hi Kevin,
This lacks a Signed-off-by. Please merge Yehuda's fix for configure when
you resend the patch.
I've sent an updated patch.
What's the easiest way to try it out? I tried to use vstart.sh and copy
the generated ceph.conf to /etc/ceph/ceph.conf
Hi Sage,
2010/12/2 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
Hi Christian,
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Christian Brunner wrote:
We have simulated the simultanious crash of multiple osds in our
environment. After starting all the cosd again, we have the following
situation:
2010-12-02 16:18:33.944436 pg
:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Christian Brunner wrote:
Presumably I'm doing something wrong here, but I don't have clue what to...
After restarting one of our osd-servers I get the following messages
in the cosd-log:
2010-11-12 10:24:31.965058 7f5bac380710 -- 10.255.0.60:6802/17175
10.255.0.60:6800
librados a lot better than me. I pretty sure,
that they will give some feedback about this remaining issue. After
that we will send an updated patch.
Regards,
Christian
2010/11/11 Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Christian Brunner c...@muc.de wrote
in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#25 0x003c0c0e151d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Christian
2010/11/4 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
Hi Christian,
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Christian Brunner wrote:
I can't promise this for tomorrow, but I think I
When accessing multiple RBD-Volumes from one VM in parallel, we are
receiving an assertion:
./osd/OSDMap.h: In function 'entity_inst_t OSDMap::get_inst(int)':
./osd/OSDMap.h:460: FAILED assert(exists(osd) is_up(osd))
ceph version 0.22.1 (commit:c6f403a6f441184956e00659ce713eaee7014279)
1:
Yes, one OSD crashed approximately an hour before this was happening.
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: gr...@hq.newdream.net [mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] Im Auftrag
von Gregory Farnum
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2010 20:00
An: Christian Brunner
Cc: ceph-devel
I can't promise this for tomorrow, but I think I can do this on Thursday.
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sage Weil [mailto:s...@newdream.net]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2010 21:09
An: Christian Brunner
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: ./osd/OSDMap.h:460: FAILED
Does someone know which commit this is? I don't want to switch to the unstable
branch at the moment.
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Smets, Jan (Jan) [mailto:jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2010 14:37
An: Christian Brunner
Betreff: RE: osd
drivers nbd, rbd and sheepdog
To: Christian Brunner c...@muc.de, Laurent Vivier
laur...@vivier.eu, MORITA Kazutaka morita.kazut...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Cc: qemu-de...@nongnu.org
Hi all,
I'm currently looking into adding a return value to qemu's bdrv_flush
function and I noticed that your block drivers
The patch has not yet been accepted by the qemu-kvm maintainers, so
the driver is not included in qemu 0.13.
We have submited an updated patch to the qemu list, but there was
no feedback.
Regards,
Christian
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:22:58PM +0800, Xiaoguang Liu wrote:
just saw qemu 0.13
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
