On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 19:26:52 -0500 (EST)
> Matt Benjamin wrote:
>
>> Could you share the branch you are trying to build? (ceph/wip-5073 would
>> not appear to be it.)
>
> It's the trunk with a few of my insignificant cleanups.
>
> But I found
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:27 AM, John Spray wrote:
> * NFS writes from the guest are lagging for like a minute before
> completing, my hunch is that this is something in the NFS client
> recovery stuff (in ganesha) that's not coping with vsock, the
> operations seem to complete at the point where
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
>
> 1- Target any pull request with a bug fix that should go into infernalis
> at the infernalis branch.
So, currently, anything targeted at both infernalis and master should
have a pull request for infernalis only? Or for both?
Daniel
--
To u
Maybe periodically run git gc on the clone out-of-line? Git runs it
occasionally when it thinks it's necessary, and that can take a while
on large and/or fragmented repos.
Daniel
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Ceph,
>
> The make check bot failed a number of pull reque
I believe preloading should work fine. It has been a common way to
debug buffer overruns using electric fence and similar tools for
years, and I have used it in large applications of similar size to
Ceph.
Daniel
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote:
>
> Pre loading jemalloc after
