I think so, but I am not sure what kind of workload would benefit from
that tune. Do you have any in mind? Is the reason for this tuneable
value to have a more storage efficient caching tier?
- Luis
On 07/07/2014 03:29 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Luis Pabon wrote:
Hi all,
What about the following usecase (please forgive some of my ceph
architecture ignorance):
If it was possible to setup OSD caching tier at the host (if the host
had a dedicated SSD for accelerating I/O), then caching pools could be
created to cache VM rbds, since they are inherently exclusive t
Thanks Sage. I'm not sure what is going on with librados2 (including
rados and rbd for that matter).
I'll see what I can do.
- Luis
On 07/15/2014 12:39 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
Hey Luis,
I pushed wip-dencoder, which moves ceph-dencoder to ceph from ceph-common.
This avoids the dependency for ce
Hi Sage,
Looks like it is configuration issue in configure.ac. I'm fixing
the issue now and will be sending a patch soon.
- Luis
On 07/15/2014 12:39 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
Hey Luis,
I pushed wip-dencoder, which moves ceph-dencoder to ceph from ceph-common.
This avoids the dependency for
Hi Yehuda,
I am starting work on RGW and have a few questions:
* Why is the command 'user create' when I am sending '--subuser'. Seems
confusing. Is there a reason why we are not to use 'subuser create'?
* If I use "user create --subuser", the JSON returned shows the entry
for "subusers"
Great thanks!
- Luis
On 08/14/2014 12:40 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Luis Pabon wrote:
Thanks for the quick turnaround Yehuda. I have just a few more comments below:
- Original Message -
From: "Yehuda Sadeh"
To: "Luis Pabón&q
Hi guys,
I created a simple test program to visualize the I/O pattern of NetApp’s
open source spc-1 workload generator. SPC-1 is an enterprise OLTP type
workload created by the Storage Performance Council
(http://www.storageperformance.org/results). Some of the results are
published and avail
Great! Gracias Alfredo. It works.
- Luis
On 12/15/2015 07:33 AM, Alfredo Deza wrote:
Oh and also worth pointing out that we don't do RHEL builds anymore
(existing rhel repos are no longer getting updated), so in this case
"el7" is the right one to use.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Alfred
