ope my wall of text makes sense. Please feel free to ping me with
questions.
Regards
Malcolm Haak
On 04/11/13 09:53, Michael Sevilla wrote:
Hi Ceph community,
I’d like to get a feel for some of the problems that CephFS users are
encountering with single MDS deployments. There were requests
I'm just going to throw these in there.
http://www.acc.umu.se/~bosse/
They are GPLv2 some already use sockets and such from inside the kernel.
Heck you might even be able to mod the HTTP one to use rados gateway.
I don't know as I havent sat down and pulled them apart enough yet.
They might
f extended metadata about whole objects, it could use the
same interfaces as well.
Hope that was acutually helpful and not just an obvious rehash...
Regards
Malcolm Haak
On 09/11/13 18:33, Sage Weil wrote:
The latest Lustre just added HSM support:
http://archive.hpcwi
changelog,
which Robinhood uses to replicate metadata into its MySQL database with all
the indices that it wants.
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Malcolm Haak wrote:
So there aren't really any hooks in that exports are triggered by the policy
engine after a scan of the metadata, an
It is, except it might not be.
Dmapi only works if you are the one in charge of the HSM and the filesystem.
So for example in a DMF solution the filesystem mounted with DMAPI
options is on your NFS head node. Your HSM solution is also installed
there.
Things get a bit more odd when you look
Hi Dave,
This is a definite bug/regression.
I've bumped into it as well.
It's still in 3.13 -rc2
I've lodged a bug report on it.
Regards
Malcolm Haak
On 24/11/13 19:59, Dave (Bob) wrote:
I have just tried ceph 0.72.1 and kernel 3.13.0-rc1.
There seems to be a problem
fo do you want/where do I start hunting for my wumpus?
Regards
Malcolm Haak
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Mark!
Thanks for the quick reply!
I'll reply inline below.
On 18/04/13 17:04, Mark Nelson wrote:
On 04/17/2013 11:35 PM, Malcolm Haak wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Malcolm!
I jumped into the IRC channel yesterday and they said to email
ceph-devel. I have been having some read performance i
@dogbreath ~]# dd if=/todd-rbd-fs/DELETEME of=/dev/null bs=4M
count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
4194304 bytes (42 GB) copied, 316.025 s, 133 MB/s
[root@dogbreath ~]#
No change which is a shame. What other information or testing should I
start?
Regards
Malcolm Haak
On 18/04/13
dropping caches on the OSD's as well, but
even if it was caching at the OSD end, the IB link is only QDR and we
aren't doing RDMA so. Yeah..No idea what is going on here...
On 19/04/13 10:40, Mark Nelson wrote:
On 04/18/2013 07:27 PM, Malcolm Haak wrote:
Morning all,
Did the echos on
e pointers!
Regards
Malcolm Haak
On 19/04/13 12:21, Malcolm Haak wrote:
Ok this is getting interesting.
rados -p bench 300 write --no-cleanup
Total time run: 301.103933
Total writes made: 22477
Write size: 4194304
Bandwidth (MB/sec): 298.595
Stddev Bandwidth:
11 matches
Mail list logo
