make it a little more light by
changing config?
--
Regards
Dominik
-Original Message-
From: Studziński Krzysztof
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:48 AM
To: Gregory Farnum; Yehuda Sadeh
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; ceph-us...@lists.ceph.com; Mostowiec Dominik
Subject: RE: [ceph-users
Hi,
Thanks for your response.
> It's possible, as deep scrub in particular will add a bit of load (it
> goes through and compares the object contents).
It is possible that the scrubbing blocks access(RW or only W) to bucket index
when check .dir... file?
When rgw index is very large I guess it
Hi,
We noticed some issues on CEPH/S3 cluster, I think it related with scrubbing:
large memory leaks.
Logs 09.xx: https://www.dropbox.com/s/4z1fzg239j43igs/ceph-osd.4.log_09xx.tar.gz
>From 09.30 to 09.44 (14 minutes) osd.4 proces grows up to 28G.
I think this is something curious:
2013-08-16 09
that "ceph osd scrub", or "ceph osd deep-scrub" trigger scrub on osd
but not for all PG.
It is possible to trigger scrubbing all PG on one osd?
--
Regards
Dominik
-Original Message-
From: Sage Weil [mailto:s...@inktank.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 5:11 PM
T
Hi,
> Is that the only slow request message you see?
No.
Full log: https://www.dropbox.com/s/i3ep5dcimndwvj1/slow_requests.txt.tar.gz
It start from:
2013-08-16 09:43:39.662878 mon.0 10.174.81.132:6788/0 4276384 : [DBG] osd.4
10.174.81.131:6805/31460 reported failed by osd.50 10.174.81.135:6842/26
Hi,
> Yes, it definitely can as scrubbing takes locks on the PG, which will prevent
> reads or writes while the message is being processed (which will involve the
> rgw index being scanned).
It is possible to tune scrubbing config for eliminate slow requests and marking
osd down when large rgw b
Hi,
I think about sharding s3 buckets in CEPH cluster, create bucket-per-XX (256
buckets) or even bucket-per-XXX (4096 buckets) where XXX is sign from object
md5 url.
Could this be the problem? (performance, or some limits)
--
Regards
Dominik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
