Question about simulation with crushtool

2012-11-22 Thread Nam Dang
tries are just blank. Basically it appears that CRUSH fails to find appropriate location for ALL the data (the devices all have the same weight). I hope someone here can tell me more about the usage of crushtool for simulation like this. THank you Best regards, Nam Dang Email: n...@de.cs.tite

Error 5 when trying to mount Ceph 0.47.1

2012-05-24 Thread Nam Dang
a couple of days googling with no avails, and the documentation does not address this issue at all. Thank you very much for your help, Best regards, Nam Dang Tokyo Institute of Technology Tokyo, Japan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body o

Problems when benchmarking Ceph

2012-05-30 Thread Nam Dang
=sakura08 mon addr=192.168.172.178:6789 [osd.0] host=sakura13 [osd.1] host=sakura14 [osd.2] host=sakura15 [osd.3] host=sakura16 [osd.4] host=sakura17 [osd.5] host=sakura18 Best regards, Nam Dang Email: n...@de.cs.titech.ac.jp Tokyo Inst

Re: Problems when benchmarking Ceph

2012-05-30 Thread Nam Dang
some library? Sorry for my inexperience but I haven't found any mentioning of IO operations for files in the API. Did I miss something? Best regards, Nam Dang Email: n...@de.cs.titech.ac.jp Tokyo Institute of Technology Tokyo, Japan On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Nam Dang wrote: >

Question about libcephfs mounting mechanism

2012-05-30 Thread Nam Dang
ess concurrently but internally the mounting point is shared. I hope somebody with experience with Ceph can help me answer this question. Thank you very much, Best regards, Nam Dang Tokyo Institute of Technology Tokyo, Japan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel&

SIGSEGV in cephfs-java, but probably in Ceph

2012-05-31 Thread Nam Dang
he probably may be due to the locking mechanism of ceph internally. But Dr. Weil previously answered my email stating that the mounting is done independently so multithreading should not lead to this problem. If there is anyway to work around this, please let me know. Best regards, Na

Re: SIGSEGV in cephfs-java, but probably in Ceph

2012-05-31 Thread Nam Dang
It turned out my monitor went down without my knowing. So my bad, it wasn't because of Ceph. Best regards, Nam Dang Tokyo Institute of Technology Tokyo, Japan On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Nam Dang wrote: > Dear all, > > I am running a small benchmark for Ceph with mult

Re: SIGSEGV in cephfs-java, but probably in Ceph

2012-05-31 Thread Nam Dang
Hi Noah, By the way, the test suite of cephfs-java has a bug. You should put the permission value in the form of 0777 instead of 777 since the number has to be octal. With 777 I got directories with weird permission settings. Best regards Nam Dang Tokyo Institute of Technology Tokyo, Japan On

Re: SIGSEGV in cephfs-java, but probably in Ceph

2012-05-31 Thread Nam Dang
No, this occurs when I call mount(null) with the monitor being taken down. The library should throw an Exception instead, but since SIGSEGV originates from libcephfs.so so I guess it's more related to Ceph's internal code. Best regards, Nam Dang Tokyo Institute of Technology Tokyo, Ja

Re: SIGSEGV in cephfs-java, but probably in Ceph

2012-05-31 Thread Nam Dang
I made a mistake in the previous email. As Noah said, this problem is due to the wrapper being used with an unsuccessfully mounted client. However, I think if the mount fails, the wrapper should throw an exception instead of letting the client continue. Best regards, Nam Dang Tokyo Institute of

Re: SIGSEGV in cephfs-java, but probably in Ceph

2012-06-05 Thread Nam Dang
to suggest you're right and Java is using native > threads. I check the error without multithreading and it was the same. And I'm using Java 6, so threads should be real threads. My guess is that it's related to some internal locking mechanism. Best regards, Nam Dang -- To uns