Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
> > Welcome,
> >
> > I have a question. Is there, any way to support multiple domains names
> > in one radosgw on virtual host type connection in S3 ??
> >
> Are you aiming at having multiple virtual domai
We are using nginx, on top of rgw. In nginx we manage to create logic,
for using a AMQP, and async operations via queues. Then workers, on
every side getiing data from own queue, and then coping data from
source, to destination in s3 API. Works for PUT/DELETE, and work
automatic when production goe
queue is re-checked, for
some time.
I am in middle of writing some article, about this, but my sickness,
have slow down this process slightly.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
wrote:
> 2013/1/31 Sławomir Skowron :
>> We are using nginx, on top of rgw. In ng
with restart, or many other cases.
Volumes are in many sizes: 1-500GB
external block device for kvm vm, like EBS.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
> Hi, Sorry for very late response, but i was sick.
>
> Our case is to make a failover rbd instance in another cluste
> Regards,
> Sébastien Han.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> Hi, Sorry for very late response, but i was sick.
>>
>> Our case is to make a failover rbd instance in another cluster. We are
>> storing block device images, for so
Like i say, yes. Now it is only option, to migrate data from one
cluster to other, and now it must be enough, with some auto features.
But is there any timeline, or any brainstorming in ceph internal
meetings, about any possible replication in block level, or something
like that ??
On 20 lut 2013
Hi,
I have some problem. After OSD expand, and cluster crush re-organize i
have 1 pg in incomplete state. How can i solve this problem ??
ceph -s
health HEALTH_WARN 1 pgs incomplete; 1 pgs stuck inactive; 1 pgs
stuck unclean
monmap e21: 3 mons at
{0=10.178.64.4:6790/0,1=10.178.64.5:6790/0,2
h.
pool 3 '.rgw.buckets' rep size 3 crush_ruleset 0 object_hash rjenkins
pg_num 4800 pgp_num 4800 last_change 908 owner 0
When will bee possible to expand number of pg's ??
Best Regards
Slawomir Skowron
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, S?awomir Skowron wrote:
>> Ok, thanks for response. But if i have crush map like this in attachment.
>>
>> All data should be balanced equal, not including hosts with 0.5 weight.
>>
>> How make data auto balanced ?? when i know
good.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, S?awomir Skowron wrote:
>>>> Ok, thanks for response. But if i have cru
Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
> Alone (one of this slow osd in mentioned tripple)
>
> 2013-03-04 18:39:27.683035 osd.23 [INF] bench: wrote 1024 MB in blocks
> of 4096 KB in 15.241943 sec at 68795 KB/sec
>
> in for loop (some slow request appear):
>
>
Hi, i do some test, to reproduce this problem.
As you can see, only one drive (each drive in same PG) is much more
utilize, then others, and there are some ops in queue on this slow
osd. This test is getting heads from s3 objects, alphabetically
sorted. This is strange. why this files is going in
Great, thanks. Now i understand everything.
Best Regards
SS
Dnia 6 mar 2013 o godz. 15:04 Yehuda Sadeh napisał(a):
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> Hi, i do some test, to reproduce this problem.
>>
>> As you can see, only one drive (each driv
Ubuntu precise:
Linux obs-10-177-66-4 3.2.0-23-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 10
20:39:51 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# mount
/dev/sdc on /vol0/data/osd.0 type ext4
(rw,noexec,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,user_xattr,data=writeback,barrier=0)
# ceph-osd -i 0 --mkjournal --mkfs --monmap /tm
roken for a few
> hours in a way that will manifest somewhat like this.
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>> Am 21.05.2012 22:41, schrieb Sławomir Skowron:
>>
>>> # ceph-osd -i 0 --mkjournal --mkfs --monmap /tmp/monmap
>>> 2012-05-21
Maybe good for journal will be two cheap MLC Intel drives on Sandforce
(320/520), 120GB or 240GB, and HPA changed to 20-30GB only for
separate journaling partitions with hardware RAID1.
I like to test setup like this, but maybe someone have any real life info ??
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:07 PM, T
Great Thanks.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>> Am 21.05.2012 22:58, schrieb Sawomir Skowron:
>> > Yes on root. 30 minutes ago on 0.46 same operation works.
>> >
>> ...
>> > Repo:
>> >
>> > deb http://ceph.com/debian/ precise main
>>
I have some performance from rbd cluster near 320MB/s on VM from 3
node cluster, but with 10GE, and with 26 2.5" SAS drives used on every
machine it's not everything that can be.
Every osd drive is raid0 with one drive via battery cached nvram in
hardware raid ctrl.
Every osd take much ram for cach
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host_protected_area
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
wrote:
> Am 21.05.2012 23:22, schrieb Sławomir Skowron:
>> Maybe good for journal will be two cheap MLC Intel drives on Sandforce
>> (320/520), 120GB or 240GB, and HP
10:16 fsid
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 536870912 May 22 10:16 journal
drwx-- 2 root root 16384 May 22 10:15 lost+found
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 May 22 10:16 store_version
-rwx-- 1 root root 0 May 22 10:16 xattr_test
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Sławomir Skowron
Ok, now it is clear to me.
I disable filestore_xattr_use_omap for now, and i will try to move
puppet class to xfs for a new cluster init :)
Thanks
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Greg Farnum wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> One more thing:
>
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> RGW is maturing. Beside looking at performance, which highly ties into
> RADOS performance, we'd like to hear whether there are certain pain
> points or future directions that you (you as in the ceph community)
> would like to see us taking.
>
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>>> RGW is maturing. Beside looking at performance, which highly ties into
>>> RADOS performance
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 22-05-12 20:07, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>>
>> RGW is maturing. Beside looking at performance, which highly ties into
>> RADOS performance, we'd like to hear whether there are certain pain
>> points or future directions that you (you a
I have two questions. My newly created cluster with xfs on all osd,
ubuntu precise, kernel 3.2.0-23-generic. Ceph 0.47.2-1precise
pool 0 'data' rep size 3 crush_ruleset 0 object_hash rjenkins pg_num
64 pgp_num 64 last_change 1228 owner 0 crash_replay_interval 45
pool 1 'metadata' rep size 3 crush_
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> I have two questions. My newly created cluster with xfs on all osd,
>> ubuntu precise, kernel 3.2.0-23-generic. Ceph 0.47.2-1precise
>>
>> pool 0 '
I know that this feature is disabled, are you planning to enable this
in near future ??
I have many of drives, and my S3 instalation use only few of them in
one time, and i need to improve that.
When i use it as rbd it use all of them.
Regards
Slawomir Skowron
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Dnia 21 lip 2012 o godz. 20:08 Yehuda Sadeh napisał(a):
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Tommi Virtanen > (mailto:t...@inktank.com)> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Sławomir Skowron >> (m
Ok everything is clear now, Thanks. I will try this in planning service works.
Regards
Slawomir Skowron.
On 23 lip 2012, at 18:00, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> My workload looks like this:
>>
>> - Max 20% are PUTs
5]
After restart this two OSD, delayed operations has gone.
When scrubbing in pg is online, again, then number of waiting objecter
requests in rgw going up, and in this case scrubbing is not going to
be end, for many hours, i have quite big problem.
Is this some known bug ?? or maybe new one ??
O
Ubuntu precise, ceph 0.48.1
After crush change, whole cluster reorganize, but one machine get very
hight load, and 4 OSD on this machine die with this in log.
After that i reboot machine, and re-init this OSD (i left one to
diagnose if needed), for full stability. Now everything is ok, but
maybe
OSD ??
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
> 3 osd after crash rebuilds ok, but rebuild of two more osd (12 and
> 30), i can't make cluster to be active+clean
>
> I do rebuild like in doc:
>
> stop osd,
> remove from crush,
> rm from map,
> r
Dnia 24 sie 2012 o godz. 17:05 Mark Nelson napisał(a):
> On 08/24/2012 09:17 AM, Stephen Perkins wrote:
>> Morning Wido (and all),
>>
I'd like to see a "best" hardware config as well... however, I'm
interested in a SAS switching fabric where the nodes do not have any
storage (excep
Nice thanks.
Dnia 24 sie 2012 o godz. 18:35 Sage Weil napisał(a):
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, S?awomir Skowron wrote:
>> I have found workaround.
>>
>> Change CRUSH to replication to osd in rule for this pool, and after
>> recovery, remapped data, i just change same rule into rack awarenes,
>> and wh
I have this problem too. My mon's in 0.48.1 cluster have 10GB RAM
each, with 78 osd, and 2k request per minute (max) in radosgw.
Now i have run one via valgrind. I will send output when mon grow up.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Xiaopong Tran wrote:
>
>
at 8:34 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
> I have this problem too. My mon's in 0.48.1 cluster have 10GB RAM
> each, with 78 osd, and 2k request per minute (max) in radosgw.
>
> Now i have run one via valgrind. I will send output when mon grow up.
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 6:03
Unfortunately here is the problem in my Ubuntu 12.04.1
--9399-- You may be able to write your own handler.
--9399-- Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
--9399-- Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report
--9399-- it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.
==9399== Warn
Ok, but in global case, when i use, a chef/puppet or any other, i wish
to change configuration in ceph.conf, and reload daemon to get new
configuration changes from ceph.conf, this feature would be very
helpful in ceph administration.
Inject is ok, for testing, or debuging.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, S?awomir Skowron wrote:
>> Unfortunately here is the problem in my Ubuntu 12.04.1
>>
>> --9399-- You may be able to write your own handler.
>> --9399-- Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
>> --9399-- Nevertheless we
a_B=0
mem_stacks_B=0
heap_tree=empty
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, S?awomir Skowron wrote:
>>> Unfortunately here is the problem in my Ubuntu 12.04.1
>>>
>>> --9399--
Every acl operation ending with 403 in PUT.
~# s3 -u test oc
Bucket Status
ocAccess Denied
Anyone know w
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>>> Every acl operation ending with 403 in PUT.
>>>
>>> ~# s3 -u test oc
ec76c6700 10 --> Content-Length: 78
2012-09-11 22:37:34.712769 7faec76c6700 10 --> Accept-Ranges: bytes
2012-09-11 22:37:34.712772 7faec76c6700 10 --> Content-type: application/xml
2012-09-11 22:37:34.712887 7faec76c6700 2 req 71188:0.004554:s3:PUT
/ocdn/files/pulscms/MjU7MDA_/ecebacddde95
2012-09-11 23:22:48.315801 7f67bd722700 2 req 75477:0.027806:s3:PUT
/ocdn/test3:put_obj:http status=200
2012-09-11 23:22:48.316010 7f67bd722700 1 == req done
req=0x274a630 http_status=200 ==
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Sławomir S
Ok, but why this happend. There is no new code started before this
problem. Is there any way to recover cluster to normal operation
withoud Access Denied in s3 any acl operation ??
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Sławomir Skowron wr
our s3 library got updated and now uses a newer s3 dialect?
>
> Basically you need to update the bucket acl, e.g.:
>
> # s3 -u create foo
> # s3 -u getacl foo | s3 -u setacl oldbucket < acl
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> Ok, but wh
I grep only for 7faec76c6700
Where are stored acl data for bucket in ceph?? Maybe acl are broken
for anonymous user ??
Ceph supporting global acl for bucket??
Dnia 12 wrz 2012 o godz. 01:27 Yehuda Sadeh napisał(a):
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> And
012-09-12 09:41:21.441029 7fa257fff700 10 --> Accept-Ranges: bytes
2012-09-12 09:41:21.441032 7fa257fff700 10 --> Content-type: application/xml
2012-09-12 09:41:21.441138 7fa257fff700 2 req 7430:0.006620:s3:GET
/ocdn/images/pulscms/ZWI7MDMsMWUwLDAsMSwx/2cbff537b4543942d6571124b9cc3910.
Problem solved. Everything because Nginx, and a request_uri in fcgi
params to radosgw.
Now request_uri is ok, and problem disappear.
Big thanks for help Yehuda.
Regards
Dnia 12 wrz 2012 o godz. 01:27 Yehuda Sadeh napisał(a):
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>
Ok, i will try, but i have all day meeting today, and tomorrow.
One more question, is there any way to check configuration not from
ceph.conf, but from running daemon in cluster ??
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Dnia 5 wrz 2012 o godz. 17:53 "Sage Weil" napisa?(a)
I have realize that requests from fastcgi in nginx from radosgw returning:
HTTP/1.1 200, not a HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Any other cgi that i run, for example php via fastcgi return this like
RFC says, with OK.
Is someone experience this problem ??
I see in code:
./src/rgw/rgw_rest.cc line 36
const sta
Ok, i will digg in nginx, thanks.
Dnia 8 lis 2012 o godz. 22:48 Yehuda Sadeh napisał(a):
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> I have realize that requests from fastcgi in nginx from radosgw returning:
>>
>> HTTP/1.1 200, not a HTTP/1.1 200 OK
>&
Welcome,
I have a question. Is there, any way to support multiple domains names
in one radosgw on virtual host type connection in S3 ??
Regards
SS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Hello. I have some questions.
1. Is there any chance to change default 4MB object size to for
example 1MB or less ??
2. I have create cluster of two mons, and 32 osd (1TB each) on two
machines. At this radosgw with apache2 for test. When i putting data
from s3 client to rados, everything is ok, b
Thanks.
2011/7/27 Wido den Hollander :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 07:58 +0200, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> Hello. I have some questions.
>>
>> 1. Is there any chance to change default 4MB object size to for
>> example 1MB or less ??
>
> If you are u
clilent, and radosgw.
Can you explain that to me on this example from real life ??
2011/7/27 Wido den Hollander :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 12:19 +0200, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> Thanks.
>>
>> 2011/7/27 Wido den Hollander :
>> > Hi,
>> &g
Dnia 27 lip 2011 o godz. 18:15 Gregory Farnum
napisał(a):
> 2011/7/27 Sławomir Skowron :
>> Ok, I will show example:
>>
>> rados df
>> pool name KB objects clones degraded
>> unfound rdrd KB
Dnia 27 lip 2011 o godz. 17:52 Sage Weil napisał(a):
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, S?awomir Skowron wrote:
>> Hello. I have some questions.
>>
>> 1. Is there any chance to change default 4MB object size to for
>> example 1MB or less ??
>
> Yeah. You can use the cephfs to set the default layout on the r
2011/7/28 Sławomir Skowron :
> Dnia 27 lip 2011 o godz. 17:52 Sage Weil napisał(a):
>
>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, S?awomir Skowron wrote:
>>> Hello. I have some questions.
>>>
>>> 1. Is there any chance to change default 4MB object size to for
>>> exa
2011/7/28 Sławomir Skowron :
> Dnia 27 lip 2011 o godz. 18:15 Gregory Farnum
> napisał(a):
>
>> 2011/7/27 Sławomir Skowron :
>>> Ok, I will show example:
>>>
>>> rados df
>>> pool name KB objects clones degraded
Yes i have made a test, and now everything is ok. Thanks for help.
iSS
Dnia 28 lip 2011 o godz. 18:36 Gregory Farnum
napisał(a):
> 2011/7/28 Sławomir Skowron :
>> Because of my test before i mount ext4 filesystems in /data/osd.(osd
>> id), but /data was a symlink to /var/da
Any decision ?? I would like to see this in RadosGW, especially, range
support in Object Restfull API.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> http://www.snia.org/cdmi
>
> There's a cdmi plugfest going on here at SDC. Also:
>
> https://github.com/scality/Droplet
> --
> To unsubscribe
Maybe, i have forgot something, but there is no doc about that.
I create a configuration with nginx and radosgw for S3.
On top of radosgw standing nginx witch cache capability. Everything
was ok in version 0.32 of ceph. A have create a new filesystem with a
newest 0.37 version, and now i have som
it off, setting the following under the global
> (or client) section in your ceph.conf:
>
> rgw print continue = false
>
> If it doesn't help we'll need to dig deeper. Thanks,
> Yehuda
>
> 2011/11/8 Sławomir Skowron :
>> Maybe, i have forgot somethi
I have some problems. Can you help me ??
ceph cluster:
ceph 0.38, oneiric, kernel 3.0.0 x86_64 - now only one machine.
kvm hypervisor:
kvm version 1.0-rc4 (0.15.92), libvirt 0.9.2, kernel 3.0.0, Ubuntu
oneiric x86_64.
I create image from qemu-img on machine with kvm VM's, and it works very well:
147 : Ignoring
invalid update watch -1
2011/12/1 Josh Durgin :
> On 12/01/2011 11:37 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>>
>> I have some problems. Can you help me ??
>>
>> ceph cluster:
>> ceph 0.38, oneiric, kernel 3.0.0 x86_64 - now only one machine.
>>
>&g
Durgin :
> On 12/09/2011 04:48 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, for my lag, but i was sick.
>>
>> I handled problem with apparmor before and now it's not a problem,
>> even when i send mail before, it was solved.
>>
>> Ok when i create image
2011/12/13 Josh Durgin :
> On 12/13/2011 04:56 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>>
>> Finally, i manage the problem with rbd with kvm 1.0, and libvirt
>> 0.9.8, or i think i manage :), but i get stuck with one thing after.
>>
>> 2011-12-13 12:13:31.173+: 21512: err
new rbd drives appear in VM.
Is there any chance to hotadd rbd device to working VM without reboot ??
2011/12/16 Sławomir Skowron :
> 2011/12/13 Josh Durgin :
>> On 12/13/2011 04:56 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>>>
>>> Finally, i manage the problem with rbd with kvm 1.0
Ehhh too long with this :) I forget to load acpiphp.
Thanks for everything, now its working beautifully. After 10h of
iozone on rbd devices, and no hang, or problem.
2011/12/20 Josh Durgin :
> On 12/19/2011 07:37 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Actual s
I have some problem with adding a new mon to existing ceph cluster.
Now cluster contains a 3 mon's, but i started with only one in one
machine. Then adding a second, and third machine, with new mon's, and
OSD. Adding, a new OSD is quiet simple, but adding, a new mon is
compilation of some pieces i
How to expand number of pg's in rgw pool ??
--
-
Pozdrawiam
Sławek "sZiBis" Skowron
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
e moment, expanding the number of pgs in a pool is not working.
> We hope to get it working in the somewhat near future (probably a few
> months). Are you attempting to expand the number of osds and running
> out of pgs?
> -Sam
>
> 2012/1/10 Sławomir Skowron :
>> How to e
u encounter?
> -Sam
>
> 2012/1/10 Sławomir Skowron :
>> I have some problem with adding a new mon to existing ceph cluster.
>>
>> Now cluster contains a 3 mon's, but i started with only one in one
>> machine. Then adding a second, and third machine, with new mon
Excellent, thanks.
Pozdrawiam
iSS
Dnia 8 lut 2012 o godz. 15:45 Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
napisał(a):
> 2012/2/8 Sławomir Skowron :
>> Is there any way to disable logging inside rados for radosgw.
>>
>> pool name category KB objects
Pozdrawiam
iSS
On 14 lut 2012, at 01:05, Noah Watkins wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> It looks like ceph_fs.h contains the mask flags (e.g. CEPH_SETATTR_MODE) used
> in ceph_setattr, but I do not see these flags in any header installed from
> .deb files (grep /usr/include/*).
>
> Am I missing a location?
I have some question, about future plans.
I know ceph is LAN DFS, not a WAN in any kind, but ;)
1. Is there any plan about tier support. Example:
I have ceph cluster with fast SAS drives, and a losts of RAM, and SSD
acceleration, and 10GE network. I use only RBD, and RadosGW. Cluster
have relativ
Dnia 17 lut 2012 o godz. 19:06 Tommi Virtanen
napisał(a):
> 2012/2/17 Sławomir Skowron :
>> 1. Is there any plan about tier support. Example:
>> I have ceph cluster with fast SAS drives, and a losts of RAM, and SSD
>> acceleration, and 10GE network. I use only RBD, and Rad
After increase number pg_num from 8 to 100 in .rgw.buckets i have some
serious problems.
pool name category KB objects clones
degraded unfound rdrd KB wr
wr KB
.intent-log - 4662 19
2012-02-20 20:34:07.619113 osd.20
10.177.64.4:6839/6735 64 : [ERR] mkpg 7.5f up [51,20,64] != acting
[20,51,64]
2012/2/20 Sławomir Skowron :
> After increase number pg_num from 8 to 100 in .rgw.buckets i have some
> serious problems.
>
> pool name category KB
40 GB in 3 copies in rgw bucket, and some data in RBD, but they can be
destroyed.
Ceph -s reports 224 GB in normal state.
Pozdrawiam
iSS
Dnia 20 lut 2012 o godz. 21:19 Sage Weil napisał(a):
> Ooh, the pg split functionality is currently broken, and we weren't
> planning on fixing it for a whi
radosgw etc
- new cluster is up with old dara
I can be done to migrate objects in .rgw.buckets pool via obsync ??
Dnia 21 lut 2012 o godz. 07:46 "Sławomir Skowron" napisał(a):
> 40 GB in 3 copies in rgw bucket, and some data in RBD, but they can be
> destroyed.
>
> Ceph -s re
Ok Sorry for trouble, this is old version of ceph on one machine. All
packages has been updated to 0.42, except a ceph package :(
2012/2/21 Sławomir Skowron :
> What is that mean v0.42 in mon log:
>
> 2012-02-21 14:31:56.188513 7f4c59cee700 -- 10.177.64.4:6789/0 >>
> 10.177.64
Unfortunately 3 hours ago i made a decision about re-init cluster :(
Some data are available via rados, but cluster was unstable, and
migration of data was difficult, on time pression from outside :)
After init a new cluster on one machine, with clean pools i was able
to increase number of pg in
After some parallel copy command via botto for many files everything,
going to slow down, and eventualy got timeout from nginx@radosgw.
# ceph -s
2012-02-28 12:16:57.818566pg v20743: 8516 pgs: 8516 active+clean;
2154 MB data, 53807 MB used, 20240 GB / 21379 GB avail
2012-02-28 12:16:57.845274
1% /vol0/data/osd.7
/dev/sdt 275G 604M 260G 1% /vol0/data/osd.19
2012/2/28 Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub :
> (resending to list)
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Sławomir Skowron
> wrote:
>>
>> 2012/2/28 Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub :
>> > On Tue, Feb 28, 20
2012/3/1 Sławomir Skowron :
> 2012/2/29 Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub :
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Sławomir Skowron
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok, it's intentional.
>>>
>>> We are checking meta info about files, then, checking md5 of file
>>
On 5 mar 2012, at 19:59, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Sławomir Skowron
> wrote:
>> 2012/3/1 Sławomir Skowron :
>>> 2012/2/29 Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub :
>>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Sławomir Skowron
>>>
2012/3/5 Sławomir Skowron :
> On 5 mar 2012, at 19:59, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Sławomir Skowron
>> wrote:
>>> 2012/3/1 Sławomir Skowron :
>>>> 2012/2/29 Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub :
>>>>> On We
On 6 mar 2012, at 18:53, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>
>> All logs from osd.24, osd.62, and osd.36 with osd debug =20 and
>> filestore debug = 20 from 2012-03-06 10:25 and more.
>>
>> http://217.144.
After some tests. PUT/GET/DELETE via Radosgw now in version 0.44 works
much better.
End of this topic.
Thanks.
2012/3/6 Sławomir Skowron :
> On 6 mar 2012, at 18:53, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>>
>>>
Dom0 - Ubuntu oneiric, kernel 3.0.0-16-server.
ii kvm
1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu16+1.0+noroms+0ubuntu10 dummy transitional package
from kvm to qemu-kvm
ii qemu1.0+noroms-0ubuntu10
dummy transitional package from qemu to qemu-kvm
ii qemu-common
On 28 mar 2012, at 18:24, Josh Durgin wrote:
> On 03/28/2012 09:13 AM, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
>> 2012/3/28 Sławomir Skowron:
>>> VM on-01 with config like in attachment (dumpxml) - hang, after
>>> attaching rbd device with kernel_bug in attachment.
>>
>&g
More info, that after i use filestore_xattr_use_omap = 1 in conf, and
ceph -w is like that in attachment in mail before.
I have downgrade to 0.44, and everything is ok now, but why this happen ??
2012/4/13 Sławomir Skowron :
> 2012-04-13 11:03:20.017166 7f63d62b47a0 -- 0.0.0.0:6848/9
Maybe it's a lame question, but is anybody knows simplest procedure,
for most non-disrubtive upgrade of ceph cluster with real workload on
it ??
It's most important if we want semi-automate this process with some
tools. Maybe there is a cookbook for this operation ?? I know that
automate this is n
On 20 kwi 2012, at 21:35, Greg Farnum wrote:
> On Friday, April 20, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Sławomir Skowron wrote:
>> Maybe it's a lame question, but is anybody knows simplest procedure,
>> for most non-disrubtive upgrade of ceph cluster with real workload on
>> it ??
&g
96 matches
Mail list logo
