Re: [PATCH] librados: Bump the version to 0.48

2012-07-06 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 07/06/2012 12:33 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote: On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote: On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Gregory Farnum wrote: Hmmm ÿÿ we generally try to modify these versions when the API changes, not on every sprint. It looks to me like Sage added one function

Re: [PATCH] librados: Bump the version to 0.48

2012-07-05 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 07/04/2012 06:33 PM, Sage Weil wrote: On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Gregory Farnum wrote: Hmmm ÿÿ we generally try to modify these versions when the API changes, not on every sprint. It looks to me like Sage added one function in 0.45 where we maybe should have bumped it, but that was a long time

[PATCH] librados: Bump the version to 0.48

2012-07-04 Thread Wido den Hollander
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl --- src/include/rados/librados.h |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/include/rados/librados.h b/src/include/rados/librados.h index 9f723f7..4870b0f 100644 --- a/src/include/rados/librados.h +++

Re: [PATCH] librados: Bump the version to 0.48

2012-07-04 Thread Gregory Farnum
Hmmm — we generally try to modify these versions when the API changes, not on every sprint. It looks to me like Sage added one function in 0.45 where we maybe should have bumped it, but that was a long time ago and at this point we should maybe just eat it? -Greg On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at

Re: [PATCH] librados: Bump the version to 0.48

2012-07-04 Thread Sage Weil
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Gregory Farnum wrote: Hmmm ÿÿ we generally try to modify these versions when the API changes, not on every sprint. It looks to me like Sage added one function in 0.45 where we maybe should have bumped it, but that was a long time ago and at this point we should maybe