On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 02:40:46PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On 03/08/2013 02:27 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:43:00AM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On 03/08/2013 10:04 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:37:36PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
From: Yan, Zheng
From: Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
dentry_lru_prune() should always call file system's d_prune callback.
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
---
fs/dcache.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:37:36PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
From: Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
dentry_lru_prune() should always call file system's d_prune callback.
Why? What bug does this fix?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
da...@fromorbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On 03/08/2013 10:04 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:37:36PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
From: Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
dentry_lru_prune() should always call file system's d_prune callback.
Why? What bug does this fix?
Ceph uses a flag to track if the dcache
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:43:00AM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On 03/08/2013 10:04 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:37:36PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
From: Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
dentry_lru_prune() should always call file system's d_prune callback.
Why? What
On 03/08/2013 02:27 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:43:00AM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On 03/08/2013 10:04 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:37:36PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
From: Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
dentry_lru_prune() should always call file
