On 05/12/2012 07:11 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
This looks correct, but seems like a more confusing calling convention
to me. Before this patch it's basically a (start, len) logical
range in the input stream.. after it's (end, len). It also seems to be
more code?
sage
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Alex Elder
On 05/12/2012 07:11 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
This looks correct, but seems like a more confusing calling convention
to me. Before this patch it's basically a (start, len) logical
range in the input stream.. after it's (end, len). It also seems to be
more code?
I'm trying to make this code more un
This looks correct, but seems like a more confusing calling convention
to me. Before this patch it's basically a (start, len) logical
range in the input stream.. after it's (end, len). It also seems to be
more code?
sage
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Alex Elder wrote:
> Make the second argument to r
Make the second argument to read_partial() be the ending input byte
position rather than the beginning offset it now represents. This
amounts to moving the addition "to + size" into the caller.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder
---
net/ceph/messenger.c | 59
-
