On 05/12/2012 07:11 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
This looks correct, but seems like a more confusing calling convention
to me. Before this patch it's basically a (start, len) logical
range in the input stream.. after it's (end, len). It also seems to be
more code?
I'm trying to make this code more
On 05/12/2012 07:11 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
This looks correct, but seems like a more confusing calling convention
to me. Before this patch it's basically a (start, len) logical
range in the input stream.. after it's (end, len). It also seems to be
more code?
sage
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Alex
This looks correct, but seems like a more confusing calling convention
to me. Before this patch it's basically a (start, len) logical
range in the input stream.. after it's (end, len). It also seems to be
more code?
sage
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Alex Elder wrote:
Make the second argument to
Make the second argument to read_partial() be the ending input byte
position rather than the beginning offset it now represents. This
amounts to moving the addition to + size into the caller.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder el...@inktank.com
---
net/ceph/messenger.c | 59
