Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Distribute re-replicated objects evenly after OSD failure

2012-05-14 Thread Jim Schutt
On 05/12/2012 05:51 PM, Sage Weil wrote: Hey Jim, These both look like reasonable changes. And it's great to see they fix behavior for you. I'm not going to merge them yet, though. We're just kicking off a CRUSH refresh project next week that will include some testing framework to more thorou

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Distribute re-replicated objects evenly after OSD failure

2012-05-12 Thread Sage Weil
Hey Jim, These both look like reasonable changes. And it's great to see they fix behavior for you. I'm not going to merge them yet, though. We're just kicking off a CRUSH refresh project next week that will include some testing framework to more thoroughly validate the quality of the output,

[RFC PATCH 0/2] Distribute re-replicated objects evenly after OSD failure

2012-05-10 Thread Jim Schutt
Hi Sage, I've been trying to solve the issue mentioned in tracker #2047, which I think is the same as I described in http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg05824.html The attached patches seem to fix it for me. I also attempted to address the local search issue you mentioned in #2047. I