pl.-Kfm. Holger Maczkowsky,
Roman Maczkowsky
GnuPG-Key-ID: 0x2DD3A649
----[ cut here ]----
kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:1375!
invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: lp ceph libceph crc32c libcrc32c fuse parport_pc parport floppy evdev i2c_piix4 button 8139too 813
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Amon Ott wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> we have hit a kernel bug with current ceph-client master (commit
> a2742a09568f81315e0f30021f29f14e7cd3924b), which I assume to be a Ceph bug.
Is it easily reproducible? What's the scenario?
>
> Kernel is x86-32, Ceph is running on
On Monday 24 October 2011 wrote Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Amon Ott wrote:
> > we have hit a kernel bug with current ceph-client master (commit
> > a2742a09568f81315e0f30021f29f14e7cd3924b), which I assume to be a Ceph
> > bug.
>
> Is it easily reproducible? What's t
On Tuesday 25 October 2011 wrote Amon Ott:
> On Monday 24 October 2011 wrote Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub:
> > Also, the client logs could help shedding a light on the issue. You
> > should have dynamic debugging turned on (CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG), and
> > something along the lines of:
> >
> > # mount -t de
On Tuesday 25 October 2011 wrote Amon Ott:
> On Tuesday 25 October 2011 wrote Amon Ott:
> > On Monday 24 October 2011 wrote Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub:
> > > Also, the client logs could help shedding a light on the issue. You
> > > should have dynamic debugging turned on (CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG), and
> >
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Amon Ott wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 October 2011 wrote Amon Ott:
> > On Tuesday 25 October 2011 wrote Amon Ott:
> > > On Monday 24 October 2011 wrote Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub:
> > > > Also, the client logs could help shedding a light on the issue. You
> > > > should have dynamic debugg
On Tuesday 01 November 2011 wrote Sage Weil:
> Can you capture a larger log segment? The hope is to catch the first
> use-after-free, and not the subsequent side-effects.
I still have the full kern.log here from boot till BUG, cleaned it up a bit
(no firewall lines, RSBAC stuff) and uploaded to
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Amon Ott wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 November 2011 wrote Sage Weil:
> > Can you capture a larger log segment? The hope is to catch the first
> > use-after-free, and not the subsequent side-effects.
>
> I still have the full kern.log here from boot till BUG, cleaned it up a bit
> (
On Wednesday 02 November 2011 you wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Amon Ott wrote:
> > On Tuesday 01 November 2011 wrote Sage Weil:
> > > Can you capture a larger log segment? The hope is to catch the first
> > > use-after-free, and not the subsequent side-effects.
> >
> > I still have the full kern.l
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Amon Ott wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 November 2011 you wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Amon Ott wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 01 November 2011 wrote Sage Weil:
> > > > Can you capture a larger log segment? The hope is to catch the first
> > > > use-after-free, and not the subsequent side
On Sunday 06 November 2011 wrote Sage Weil:
> Pretty sure I've found this. Can you test the patch below?
With this patch, the bug disappeared. Thank you, good work!
Unfortunately, I hit another bug with ceph_filldir(). Will report on that one
soon, when I know more. Might also be my fault, need
11 matches
Mail list logo
