Re: Issue with replication level.

2011-03-09 Thread Upendra Moturi
Thank you Brian Chrisman and Gregory Farnum for help. I understood the concept and able to figure out and fix it by separating journal from data volume.(having a separate partition for journal) On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Tuesday, March 8, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Brian C

Re: Issue with replication level.

2011-03-08 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Tuesday, March 8, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Brian Chrisman wrote: Just making sure I'm interpreting this right. > At steady state (data_size >> journal_size), total space usage for 2x > replication should be 2 * data_size + journal_size? > If you have (data_size < journal_size) and journal is on a file

Re: Issue with replication level.

2011-03-08 Thread Brian Chrisman
Just making sure I'm interpreting this right. At steady state (data_size >> journal_size), total space usage for 2x replication should be 2 * data_size + journal_size? If you have (data_size < journal_size) and journal is on a file rather than on a partition, then btrfs will report 4x data size. O

Re: Issue with replication level.

2011-03-08 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Tuesday, March 8, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Upendra Moturi wrote: Hi > > I am having issue witrh replication levels. > Even though i have set data @2x and mds@1x replication,the data copied > is occupying 4x space How are you measuring the data use as being at 4x? Keep in mind that data will be journ

Issue with replication level.

2011-03-08 Thread Upendra Moturi
Hi I am having issue witrh replication levels. Even though i have set data @2x and mds@1x replication,the data copied is occupying 4x space I have used default crush map rules. 2) how to see how much space does a mon,mds,data,casdata and rbd occupied individually. My ceph.conf [global]