On Thursday 17 of May 2012 20:59:52 Josh Durgin wrote:
On 05/17/2012 03:59 AM, Karol Jurak wrote:
How serious is such situation? Do the OSDs know how to handle it
correctly? Or could this result in some data loss or corruption?
After the recovery finished (ceph -w showed that all PGs are in
at
863363072 : JOURNAL FULL 863363072 = 1048571903 (max_size 1048576000
start 863363072)
2012-05-12 13:31:04.034680 7f491061d700 0 journal JOURNAL TOO SMALL:
item 1693745152 journal 1048571904 (usable)
I was under the impression that the OSDs stopped participating in
recovery after
On 05/18/2012 03:56 AM, Karol Jurak wrote:
On Thursday 17 of May 2012 20:59:52 Josh Durgin wrote:
On 05/17/2012 03:59 AM, Karol Jurak wrote:
How serious is such situation? Do the OSDs know how to handle it
correctly? Or could this result in some data loss or corruption?
After the recovery
:04.034680 7f491061d700 0 journal JOURNAL TOO SMALL: item
1693745152 journal 1048571904 (usable)
I was under the impression that the OSDs stopped participating in recovery
after this event. (ceph -w showed that the number of PGs in state
active+clean no longer increased.) They resumed recovery
1048576000
start 863363072)
2012-05-12 13:31:04.034680 7f491061d700 0 journal JOURNAL TOO SMALL: item
1693745152 journal 1048571904 (usable)
I was under the impression that the OSDs stopped participating in recovery
after this event. (ceph -w showed that the number of PGs in state
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
2012-05-12 13:31:04.034144 7f491061d700 1 journal check_for_full at
863363072 : JOURNAL FULL 863363072 = 1048571903 (max_size 1048576000
start 863363072)
2012-05-12 13:31:04.034680 7f491061d700 0 journal JOURNAL TOO SMALL
:04.034680 7f491061d700 0 journal JOURNAL TOO SMALL: item
1693745152 journal 1048571904 (usable)
The osds tolerate the full journal. There will be a big latency spike,
but they'll recover without risking data. You should definitely increase
the journal size if this happens regulary, though
On 05/17/2012 03:59 AM, Karol Jurak wrote:
How serious is such situation? Do the OSDs know how to handle it
correctly? Or could this result in some data loss or corruption? After the
recovery finished (ceph -w showed that all PGs are in active+clean state)
I noticed that a few rbd images were
