On 12/14/2012 03:41 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at commit e3ed28eb2 in the next branch,
and I have a question.
Shouldn't the limit be pg_num 65536, because
PGs are numbered 0 thru pg_num-1?
If not, what am I missing?
FWIW, up through yesterday I've been using the next branch and
Hi,
I'm looking at commit e3ed28eb2 in the next branch,
and I have a question.
Shouldn't the limit be pg_num 65536, because
PGs are numbered 0 thru pg_num-1?
If not, what am I missing?
FWIW, up through yesterday I've been using the next branch and this:
ceph osd pool set data pg_num 65536
On 12/14/2012 03:41 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at commit e3ed28eb2 in the next branch,
and I have a question.
Shouldn't the limit be pg_num 65536, because
PGs are numbered 0 thru pg_num-1?
If not, what am I missing?
FWIW, up through yesterday I've been using the next branch and
On 12/14/2012 09:59 AM, Joao Eduardo Luis wrote:
On 12/14/2012 03:41 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at commit e3ed28eb2 in the next branch,
and I have a question.
Shouldn't the limit be pg_num 65536, because
PGs are numbered 0 thru pg_num-1?
If not, what am I missing?
FWIW, up