19, 2015 7:07 PM
To: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔; Kaga, Yoshihiro/加賀 芳宏;
Kawaguchi, Shotaro/川口 翔太朗
Subject: Re: conditions for removing experimental feature marks
On 19/03/2015 09:50, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
> Dear L
shi/宮前 剛; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔; Kaga, Yoshihiro/加賀 芳宏;
> Kawaguchi, Shotaro/川口 翔太朗
> Subject: Re: conditions for removing experimental feature marks
>
> Hi,
>
> On 19/03/2015 03:20, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
>> Dea
輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔; Kaga, Yoshihiro/加賀 芳宏;
Kawaguchi, Shotaro/川口 翔太朗
Subject: Re: conditions for removing experimental feature marks
Hi,
On 19/03/2015 03:20, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
> Dear Loic,
>
> We are struggling with teuthology, but we must commit SHEC's rece
can adapt the instructions from
>> http://dachary.org/?p=2204 to your local environment. All you need really is
>> the ability to run two virtual machines.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Takeshi Miyamae
>>>
>>> -
> To: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔; Kaga, Yoshihiro/加賀 芳宏;
> Kawaguchi, Shotaro/川口 翔太朗
> Subject: Re: conditions for removing experimental feature marks
>
> Hi !
>
> On 10/03/2015 11:35, Miyamae, Take
nel.org
Cc: Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔; Kaga, Yoshihiro/加賀 芳宏;
Kawaguchi, Shotaro/川口 翔太朗
Subject: Re: conditions for removing experimental feature marks
Hi !
On 10/03/2015 11:35, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
> Dear Loic,
>
> I really apologize that our reply is too lat
; Takeshi Miyamae
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Loic Dachary [mailto:l...@dachary.org]
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 6:17 PM
> To: Miyamae, Takeshi/宮前 剛; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Shiozawa, Kensuke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔
> Subject: Re: conditions for removi
ke/塩沢 賢輔; Nakao, Takanori/中尾 鷹詔
Subject: Re: conditions for removing experimental feature marks
Hi,
On 16/02/2015 08:37, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
> Dear Loic,
>
> Thank you for your help on the pull request of SHEC last week.
> We believe that marking experimental feature on SHEC was i
Hi,
On 16/02/2015 08:37, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
> Dear Loic,
>
> Thank you for your help on the pull request of SHEC last week.
> We believe that marking experimental feature on SHEC was inevitable and
> the way to restrict the feature is proper.
>
> By the way, could you let us know what are t
