-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mark Nelson
Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2015 4:25 PM
To: Sage Weil; Andreas Bluemle
Cc: Blinick, Stephen L; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wip-auth
Hi All,
I completed some tests with wip-auth to the memstore on ubuntu earlier today.
Basic gist
le
> Cc: Blinick, Stephen L; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: wip-auth
>
> Hi All,
>
> I completed some tests with wip-auth to the memstore on ubuntu earlier today.
> Basic gist of it is that the improvements in wip-auth help but don't quite
> get
À: "aderumier"
Cc: "Sage Weil" , "Andreas Bluemle"
, "Stephen L Blinick"
, "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Lundi 9 Février 2015 19:24:18
Objet: Re: wip-auth
Hi Alex,
So far we don't really know, but suspect kernel/networking related
things. sysctl -a sh
uot;Stephen L Blinick" , "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Février 2015 00:24:42
Objet: Re: wip-auth
Hi All,
I completed some tests with wip-auth to the memstore on ubuntu earlier
today. Basic gist of it is that the improvements in wip-auth help but
don't quite get us to what can be
Mail original -
De: "Mark Nelson"
À: "Sage Weil" , "Andreas Bluemle"
Cc: "Stephen L Blinick" , "ceph-devel"
Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Février 2015 00:24:42
Objet: Re: wip-auth
Hi All,
I completed some tests with wip-auth to the memstore on ubuntu ea
nt: Monday, January 26, 2015 10:24 AM To: Blinick, Stephen L
Cc: andreas.blue...@itxperts.de; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: wip-auth
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Blinick, Stephen L wrote:
I noticed that the spec file for building RPM's defaults to
building with libnss, instead of libcrypto++.
l use
> > > libcryptopp if the dependency is installed on the build machine
> > > (last I looked).
> > >
> > > I forgot to mention the numbers below were based on v.91.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Stephen
> > &g
lled on the build machine
> > (last I looked).
> >
> > I forgot to mention the numbers below were based on v.91.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> > [
uary 26, 2015 11:16 AM
To: Blinick, Stephen L; Sage Weil
Cc: andreas.blue...@itxperts.de; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wip-auth
Hi Stephen,
Does this explain the results you were seeing earlier with the memstore testing?
Mark
On 01/26/2015 12:00 PM, Blinick, Stephen L wrote:
> Good
ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sage Weil
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 10:24 AM
> To: Blinick, Stephen L
> Cc: andreas.blue...@itxperts.de; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: wip-auth
>
> On Mon, 26 Jan 20
...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sage Weil
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 10:24 AM
To: Blinick, Stephen L
Cc: andreas.blue...@itxperts.de; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: wip-auth
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Blinick, Stephen L wrote:
I noticed that the spec file for building RPM's defaults to building
Subject: RE: wip-auth
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Blinick, Stephen L wrote:
> I noticed that the spec file for building RPM's defaults to building with
> libnss, instead of libcrypto++. Since the measurements I'd done so far were
> from those RPM's I rebuilt with libcrypto
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Blinick, Stephen L wrote:
> I noticed that the spec file for building RPM's defaults to building with
> libnss, instead of libcrypto++. Since the measurements I'd done so far were
> from those RPM's I rebuilt with libcrypto++.. so FWIW here is the difference
> between those
I noticed that the spec file for building RPM's defaults to building with
libnss, instead of libcrypto++. Since the measurements I'd done so far were
from those RPM's I rebuilt with libcrypto++.. so FWIW here is the difference
between those two on my system, memstore backend with a single OSD,
14 matches
Mail list logo
