Le 23/11/2011 16:13, Sage Weil a écrit :
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Nov 22, 2011, Sage Weils...@newdream.net wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
- compression: I'm using lzo compression right now, as my CPUs in the
OSD nodes where idle most of the time
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Yann Dupont wrote:
Le 23/11/2011 16:13, Sage Weil a écrit :
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Nov 22, 2011, Sage Weils...@newdream.net wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
- compression: I'm using lzo compression right now,
Le 05/04/2012 17:11, Sage Weil a écrit :
Yes, it's safe. We fall back to a manual copy if we see EINVAL from the
ioctl.
sage
Great, thanks for the answer .
cheers,
--
Yann Dupont - Service IRTS, DSI Université de Nantes
Tel : 02.53.48.49.20 - Mail/Jabber : yann.dup...@univ-nantes.fr
--
On Nov 22, 2011, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
- compression: I'm using lzo compression right now, as my CPUs in the
OSD nodes where idle most of the time and it is improving throughput
quite a bit.
The caveat here is that there is a
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Nov 22, 2011, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
- compression: I'm using lzo compression right now, as my CPUs in the
OSD nodes where idle most of the time and it is improving throughput
Reading the latest pull request by Chris Mason, I was wondering about
the recommended mount options for an OSD-Filesystem.
In the past I came across the following btrfs options, that were used
in conjunction with ceph:
- nodatacow: To avoid fragmentation. I think this one makes sense when
you
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
Reading the latest pull request by Chris Mason, I was wondering about
the recommended mount options for an OSD-Filesystem.
In the past I came across the following btrfs options, that were used
in conjunction with ceph:
- nodatacow: To avoid
