Hi Yuri,
I analyzed the errors from the rbd run at
http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-08_10:36:47-rbd-giant-backports-testing-basic-vps/
and summarized my findings in the description of
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501
It would be great if you could let me know if these look familiar. Th
Hi,
The rgw suite was scheduled (same as rbd only changed to rgw):
./virtualenv/bin/teuthology-suite --teuthology-branch giant --suite rgw
--suite-branch giant --machine-type vps --distro ubuntu --email
l...@dachary.org --owner l...@dachary.org --ceph giant-backports
it is at
http://pulpito
Hi Tamil,
The test completed with a number of failures. I compared them with the latest
giant / rbd run (which is on the red hat private lab). The number of failure is
comparable (40 failed out of 102 january 6th 2015). However the failures are
mostly different and I'm not sure what to do next.
On 01/07/2015 04:40 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Great, thanks, I did not know about this one :-)
>
> On 08/01/2015 00:29, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
>> Look for them in new Octo lab - http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/
Not everyone in the community is going to know about the Octo lab, and
that URL is unava
Hi,
The giant-backports branch has been built by gitbuilders tonight
http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-deb-trusty-amd64-basic/#origin/giant-backports
etc.
and I scheduled a rbd suite with
./virtualenv/bin/teuthology-suite --teuthology-branch giant --suite rbd
--suite-branch gian
Great, thanks, I did not know about this one :-)
On 08/01/2015 00:29, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> Look for them in new Octo lab - http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Yuri & Tamil !
>>
>> One last question : http://pulpito.ceph.com/?bra
Look for them in new Octo lab - http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
> Thanks Yuri & Tamil !
>
> One last question : http://pulpito.ceph.com/?branch=giant does not show a run
> of rbd or rgw. They would be useful to figure out what kind of errors
Thanks Yuri & Tamil !
One last question : http://pulpito.ceph.com/?branch=giant does not show a run
of rbd or rgw. They would be useful to figure out what kind of errors I should
expect. Are past results archived elsewhere by any chance ?
On 07/01/2015 23:53, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote:
> yes, j
yes, just those suites will do Loic.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Yuri Weinstein
wrote:
> Loic,
>
> I think if you run those on bare metals (not vps) they will run on
> whatever machines are available in the octo or sepia labs.
>
> Thx
> YuriW
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Loic Dachary
Loic,
I think if you run those on bare metals (not vps) they will run on
whatever machines are available in the octo or sepia labs.
Thx
YuriW
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
>
> On 07/01/2015 23:20, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote:
>> hi Loic,
>>
>> we have a suite to perform smok
On 07/01/2015 23:20, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote:
> hi Loic,
>
> we have a suite to perform smoke tests for rados/rbd/rgw.
> maybe you can try that to make sure things work.
Are these the suites I should try:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rados
https://github.com/ceph/ce
Hi Tamil,
I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289
12 matches
Mail list logo
