On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 00:38 +0100, John Spray wrote:
OK, here are vstart+ceph.in changes that work well enough in my out of
tree build:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5457
Great!
John
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:09 AM, John Spray jsp...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 8:24
first action items.
-Ali
- Original Message -
From: Owen Synge osy...@suse.com
To: Ali Maredia amare...@redhat.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 6:42:31 AM
Subject: Re: Transitioning Ceph from Autotools to CMake
Dear Ali,
I am glad you are making
Dear Ali,
I am glad you are making progress.
Sadly I don't yet know cmake.
Please consider the systemd wip branch. It might be wise to leave
autotools around a little longer, until all functionality is in the cmake.
Best regards
Owen
On 07/30/2015 09:01 PM, Ali Maredia wrote:
After
: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 6:42:31 AM
Subject: Re: Transitioning Ceph from Autotools to CMake
Dear Ali,
I am glad you are making progress.
Sadly I don't yet know cmake.
Please consider the systemd wip branch. It might be wise to leave
autotools around a little longer, until all functionality
OK, here are vstart+ceph.in changes that work well enough in my out of
tree build:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5457
John
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:09 AM, John Spray jsp...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Orit Wasserman owass...@redhat.com wrote:
3. no vstart.sh ,
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Orit Wasserman owass...@redhat.com wrote:
3. no vstart.sh , starting working on this too but have less progress
here. At the moment in order to use vstart I copy the exe and libs to
src dir.
I just started playing with CMake on Friday, adding some missing
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 15:01 -0400, Ali Maredia wrote:
After discussing with several other Ceph developers and Sage, I wanted
to start a discussion about making CMake the primary build system for Ceph.
CMake works just fine as it is (make -j4 on master with CMake builds
350% faster than
On 07/30/2015 01:01 PM, Ali Maredia wrote:
- Creating CMake targets that build packages (such as for rpm or debian)
There was some discussion on the list a while back about how we don't
really need to go through the full autoconf + ./configure + make rpm
routine simply to generate packages with
After discussing with several other Ceph developers and Sage, I wanted
to start a discussion about making CMake the primary build system for Ceph.
CMake works just fine as it is (make -j4 on master with CMake builds
350% faster than autotools!), but there's more work needed to make it
into a
Just here to provide moral support. Go CMake go! :)
Mark
On 07/30/2015 02:01 PM, Ali Maredia wrote:
After discussing with several other Ceph developers and Sage, I wanted
to start a discussion about making CMake the primary build system for Ceph.
CMake works just fine as it is (make -j4 on
10 matches
Mail list logo
