Hi *,
anybody out there who's in Ubuntu 12.04.1/ in connection with libc + xfs
+ syncfs?
We bit the bullet and reinstalled two new nodes from debian to precise
in favour of possible performance increase?!
*sigh*, still getting:
2012-11-06 17:05:51.863921 7f5cc52e3780 0 filestore(/data/osd
In answer to myself,
On 11/06/2012 05:14 PM, Oliver Francke wrote:
Hi *,
anybody out there who's in Ubuntu 12.04.1/ in connection with libc +
xfs + syncfs?
ii libc62.15-0ubuntu10.3
but:
apt-cache show...
.
.
Provides: glibc-2.13-1
.
.
playing with numbers, I th
syncfs is only available since glibc 2.14 (and kernel 2.6.39)
- Mail original -
De: "Oliver Francke"
À: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Envoyé: Mardi 6 Novembre 2012 17:31:29
Objet: Re: Ubuntu 12.04.1 + xfs + syncfs is still not our friend
In answer to myself,
On 11/06/201
Hi Jens,
sorry for the double work… answered off-list already ;)
Oliver.
Am 06.11.2012 um 19:46 schrieb Jens Rehpöhler :
> On 06.11.2012 18:33, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
>> 2012/11/6 Oliver Francke :
>>> 2012-11-06 17:05:51.863921 7f5cc52e3780 0 filestore(/data/osd6-3) mount
>>> syncfs(2) s
On 06.11.2012 18:33, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> 2012/11/6 Oliver Francke :
>> 2012-11-06 17:05:51.863921 7f5cc52e3780 0 filestore(/data/osd6-3) mount
>> syncfs(2) syscall not support by glibc
>> 2012-11-06 17:05:51.863925 7f5cc52e3780 0 filestore(/data/osd6-3) mount no
>> syncfs(2), must use
Resolution: installing the packages built for precise, rather than
squeeze, got versions that use syncfs.
On 11/06/2012 08:31 AM, Oliver Francke wrote:
In answer to myself,
On 11/06/2012 05:14 PM, Oliver Francke wrote:
Hi *,
anybody out there who's in Ubuntu 12.04.1/ in connection with libc
On 11/07/2012 12:14 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
2012/11/7 Dan Mick :
Resolution: installing the packages built for precise, rather than squeeze,
got versions that use syncfs.
Which packages, ceph or libc?
The ceph packages.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ce
