Hi everyone,
please enlighten me if I'm misinterpreting something, but I think the
Ceph FS layer could handle the following situation better.
How to reproduce (this is on a 3.2.0 kernel):
1. Create a client, mine is named "test", with the following capabilities:
client.test
key:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> please enlighten me if I'm misinterpreting something, but I think the
> Ceph FS layer could handle the following situation better.
>
> How to reproduce (this is on a 3.2.0 kernel):
>
> 1. Create a client, mine is named "test",
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>> Also, going down the rabbit hole, how would this behavior change if I
>> used cephfs to set the default layout on some directory to use a
>> different pool?
>
> I'm not sure what you're asking here — if you have access to the
> metadata ser
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>>> Also, going down the rabbit hole, how would this behavior change if I
>>> used cephfs to set the default layout on some directory to use a
>>> different pool?
>>
>> I'm not sure what y
