On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> Hi Zheng,
>
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, ?? wrote:
>> > ? 2015?2?20??06:23?John Spray ???
>> >
>> >
>> > Background: a while ago, we found (#10277) that existing cache expiration
>> > mechanism wasn't working with latest kernels. We used to invalida
Hi Zheng,
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, ?? wrote:
> > ? 2015?2?20??06:23?John Spray ???
> >
> >
> > Background: a while ago, we found (#10277) that existing cache expiration
> > mechanism wasn't working with latest kernels. We used to invalidate the
> > top level dentries, which caused fuse to invali
> 在 2015年2月20日，06:23，John Spray 写道：
>
>
> Background: a while ago, we found (#10277) that existing cache expiration
> mechanism wasn't working with latest kernels. We used to invalidate the top
> level dentries, which caused fuse to invalidate everything, but an
> implementation detail in f
- Original Message -
> From: "John Spray"
> To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, z...@redhat.com, "Gregory Farnum"
>
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 2:23:21 PM
> Subject: ceph-fuse remount issues
>
>
> Background: a while ago, we fou
Background: a while ago, we found (#10277) that existing cache
expiration mechanism wasn't working with latest kernels. We used to
invalidate the top level dentries, which caused fuse to invalidate
everything, but an implementation detail in fuse caused it to start
ignoring our repeated inva
