On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> Resurrecting this thread since we need to make a decision soon. The
> opinions broke down like so:
>
> A - me
> B - john
> C - alex
> D - loic (and drop release names), yehuda, ilya
> openstack - dmsimard
>
> So, most people seem to like D
Resurrecting this thread since we need to make a decision soon. The
opinions broke down like so:
A - me
B - john
C - alex
D - loic (and drop release names), yehuda, ilya
openstack - dmsimard
So, most people seem to like D (below):
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Sage Weil wrote:
> -- Option D -- "la
On 26/02/2015 23:12, Sage Weil wrote:
Hammer will most likely be v0.94[.x]. We're getting awfully close to
0.99, though, which makes many people think 1.0 or 1.00 (isntead of
0.100), and the current versioning is getting a bit silly. So let's talk
about alternatives!
I'm late to this thread,
t;>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27/02/2015 00:59, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>>>> From: "Loic Dachary"
>>>>>>> To: "Sage Weil&
Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>>> From: "Loic Dachary"
>>>>>> To: "Sage Weil" , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015
l Message -
>>>>> From: "Loic Dachary"
>>>>> To: "Sage Weil" , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 3:38:31 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: ceph versions
>>>>>
>>>>&
On 27/02/2015 17:29, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Loic Dachary"
>> To: "Ilya Dryomov"
>> Cc: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" , "Sage Weil"
>> , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
&g
- Original Message -
> From: "Loic Dachary"
> To: "Ilya Dryomov"
> Cc: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" , "Sage Weil"
> , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 5:55:32 AM
> Subject: Re: ceph versions
>
>
>>>> On 27/02/2015 00:59, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>>> From: "Loic Dachary"
>>>>>> To: "Sage Weil" , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>> Se
t;>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>> From: "Loic Dachary"
>>>>> To: "Sage Weil" , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 3:38:31 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: ceph versions
>>>
>>>> To: "Sage Weil" , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 3:38:31 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: ceph versions
>>>>
>>>> Hi Sage,
>>>>
>>>> I prefer Option D because it's self expl
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
>
>
> On 27/02/2015 00:59, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Loic Dachary"
>>> To: "Sage Weil" , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
>&
Can I also throw another option out there ?
Openstack uses a version scheme tied to the year of release [1].
Looking back at past releases [2], we can see that for example "Icehouse"
was the first release of 2014: "2014.1".
Icehouse eventually had stable releases which were versioned 2014.1.1,
201
On 27/02/2015 00:59, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Loic Dachary"
>> To: "Sage Weil" , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
>> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 3:38:31 PM
>> Subject: Re: ceph versions
>
Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Loic Dachary"
>> To: "Sage Weil" , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
>> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 3:38:31 PM
>> Subject: Re: ceph versions
>>
>> Hi Sage,
Commentary inline.
Note that when I talk about dependencies, I'm speaking as someone who does
distro packaging - and thus what would require manual changes on the
packager's part vs. ability to specify general constraints.
Sage Weil wrote:
> Hammer will most likely be v0.94[.x]. We're getting
- Original Message -
> From: "Loic Dachary"
> To: "Sage Weil" , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 3:38:31 PM
> Subject: Re: ceph versions
>
> Hi Sage,
>
> I prefer Option D because it's self explanatory. We
Hi Sage,
I prefer Option D because it's self explanatory. We could also drop the names.
I became attached to them but they are confusing to the new users who is
required to remember that firefly is 0.80, giant is 0.87 etc.
Cheers
On 27/02/2015 00:12, Sage Weil wrote:
> -- Option D -- "labeled"
Hammer will most likely be v0.94[.x]. We're getting awfully close to
0.99, though, which makes many people think 1.0 or 1.00 (isntead of
0.100), and the current versioning is getting a bit silly. So let's talk
about alternatives!
Here are a few of options:
-- Option A -- "doubles and triples
19 matches
Mail list logo