Hey Jim,
Running the third test with tunable chooseleaf_descend_once 0 with no
devices marked out yields the following result
(999.827397, 0.48667056652539997)
so chi squared value is 999 with a corresponding p value of 0.487 so
that the placement distribution seems to be drawn from
On 11/28/2012 09:11 AM, Caleb Miles wrote:
Hey Jim,
Running the third test with tunable chooseleaf_descend_once 0 with no
devices marked out yields the following result
(999.827397, 0.48667056652539997)
so chi squared value is 999 with a corresponding p value of 0.487 so
Hi Caleb,
On 11/26/2012 07:28 PM, caleb miles wrote:
Hello all,
Here's what I've done to try and validate the new chooseleaf_descend_once
tunable first described in commit f1a53c5e80a48557e63db9c52b83f39391bc69b8 in
the wip-crush branch of ceph.git.
First I set the new tunable to it's
Hello all,
Here's what I've done to try and validate the new
chooseleaf_descend_once tunable first described in commit
f1a53c5e80a48557e63db9c52b83f39391bc69b8 in the wip-crush branch of
ceph.git.
First I set the new tunable to it's legacy value, disabled,
tunable choose_local_tries 0
