Re: clock syncronisation

2012-11-08 Thread Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
Am 08.11.2012 13:00, schrieb Wido den Hollander: On 08-11-12 10:04, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: Hello list, is there any prefered way to use clock syncronisation? I've tried running openntpd and ntpd on all servers but i'm still getting: 2012-11-08 09:55:38.255928

Re: clock syncronisation

2012-11-08 Thread Andrey Korolyov
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 08-11-12 10:04, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: >> >> Hello list, >> >> is there any prefered way to use clock syncronisation? >> >> I've tried running openntpd and ntpd on a

Re: clock syncronisation

2012-11-08 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 08-11-12 10:04, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: Hello list, is there any prefered way to use clock syncronisation? I've tried running openntpd and ntpd on all servers but i'm still getting: 2012-11-08 09:55:38.255928 mon.0 [WRN] message from mon.2 was stamped 0.063136s in

clock syncronisation

2012-11-08 Thread Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
Hello list, is there any prefered way to use clock syncronisation? I've tried running openntpd and ntpd on all servers but i'm still getting: 2012-11-08 09:55:38.255928 mon.0 [WRN] message from mon.2 was stamped 0.063136s in the future, clocks not synchronized 2012-11-08 09:55:39.32