> -Original Message-
> From: David Zafman [mailto:dzaf...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 5:21 PM
>
> This is a dangerous command because it can remove all your objects.
Well, that's the point of it, isn't it?
> At least
> it can only do one namespace at a time. It was intende
" --run-name ""
Regards,
Igor.
-Original Message-
From: David Zafman [mailto:dzaf...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 3:46 AM
To: Podoski, Igor; Deneau, Tom; Dałek, Piotr; ceph-devel
Subject: Re: deleting objects from a pool
If you have rados bench data around, you
n [mailto:dzaf...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 3:46 AM
To: Podoski, Igor; Deneau, Tom; Dałek, Piotr; ceph-devel
Subject: Re: deleting objects from a pool
If you have rados bench data around, you'll need to run cleanup a second time
because the first time the "benchmark_last_met
ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Deneau, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:22 PM
To: Dałek, Piotr; ceph-devel
Subject: RE: deleting objects from a pool
I've noticed that deleting objects from a basic k=2 m=1 erasure pool is much
much slower t
age-
> From: Podoski, Igor [mailto:igor.podo...@ts.fujitsu.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 1:06 AM
> To: Deneau, Tom; Dałek, Piotr; ceph-devel
> Subject: RE: deleting objects from a pool
>
> Hi,
>
> It appears, that cleanup can be used as a purge:
>
> rados -p
łek, Piotr; ceph-devel
Subject: RE: deleting objects from a pool
I've noticed that deleting objects from a basic k=2 m=1 erasure pool is much
much slower than deleting a similar number of objects from a replicated size 3
pool (so the same number of files to be deleted). It looked like the
more work to be done to
delete an ec pool object?
-- Tom
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Dalek, Piotr
> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 11:56 AM
> To: ceph-devel
> Subject: Re: delet
> -Original Message-
> From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Deneau, Tom
> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 6:44 PM
>
> I have benchmarking situations where I want to leave a pool around but
> delete a lot of objects from the pool.
I have benchmarking situations where I want to leave a pool around but
delete a lot of objects from the pool. Is there any really fast way to do that?
I noticed rados rmpool is fast but I don't want to remove the pool.
I have been spawning multiple threads, each deleting a subset of the objects
(