On 04/30/2013 02:08 AM, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote:
Supposedly, on 2013-Apr-22, at 06.19 PDT(-0700), someone claiming to be Loic
Dachary scribed:
Hi Christopher,
Jack Lloyd is the author of fecpp ( http://www.randombit.net/code/fecpp/ )
and he tells me someone sent him a new SIMD
On 22 Apr 2013, at 14:19, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Christopher,
Jack Lloyd is the author of fecpp ( http://www.randombit.net/code/fecpp/ )
and he tells me someone sent him a new SIMD approach a few weeks ago. I'm not
sure what SIMD means yet, but I'll figure it out ;-). I tend to favor
On 04/29/2013 04:06 PM, Jimmy Tang wrote:
On 22 Apr 2013, at 14:19, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Christopher,
Jack Lloyd is the author of fecpp ( http://www.randombit.net/code/fecpp/ )
and he tells me someone sent him a new SIMD approach a few weeks ago. I'm
not sure what SIMD means yet,
Supposedly, on 2013-Apr-22, at 06.19 PDT(-0700), someone claiming to be Loic
Dachary scribed:
Hi Christopher,
Jack Lloyd is the author of fecpp ( http://www.randombit.net/code/fecpp/ )
and he tells me someone sent him a new SIMD approach a few weeks ago. I'm not
sure what SIMD means yet,
Supposedly, on 2013-Apr-29, at 07.23 PDT(-0700), someone claiming to be Loic
Dachary scribed:
On 04/29/2013 04:06 PM, Jimmy Tang wrote:
On 22 Apr 2013, at 14:19, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Christopher,
Jack Lloyd is the author of fecpp ( http://www.randombit.net/code/fecpp/ )
and he tells
Hi Christopher,
Jack Lloyd is the author of fecpp ( http://www.randombit.net/code/fecpp/ ) and
he tells me someone sent him a new SIMD approach a few weeks ago. I'm not sure
what SIMD means yet, but I'll figure it out ;-). I tend to favor fecpp because
it is more self contained and may be
