> On Jul 14, 2015, at 1:47 AM, Owen Synge wrote:
>
> On 07/09/2015 09:58 PM, Travis Rhoden wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2015, at 4:59 AM, Owen Synge wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/09/2015 12:46 PM, John Spray wrote:
Owen,
>>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> thanks for your reasonable mail.
>>>
Please can
On 07/09/2015 09:58 PM, Travis Rhoden wrote:
>
>> On Jul 9, 2015, at 4:59 AM, Owen Synge wrote:
>>
>> On 07/09/2015 12:46 PM, John Spray wrote:
>>> Owen,
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> thanks for your reasonable mail.
>>
>>> Please can you say what your overall goal is with recent ceph-deploy
>>> patches?
> On Jul 9, 2015, at 4:59 AM, Owen Synge wrote:
>
> On 07/09/2015 12:46 PM, John Spray wrote:
>> Owen,
>
> Hi John,
>
> thanks for your reasonable mail.
>
>> Please can you say what your overall goal is with recent ceph-deploy
>> patches?
>
> To give ceph-deploy code features we have in dow
Hi Owen,
There are quite a few emails in this thread already, but there are points in
each of them I would like to address.
Up front let me say I hear and recognize your frustration. If you’ve felt
ignored, I apologize. I think you’ve turned around a lot of patches, PR
comments, and emails f
Small correction due to not proof reading enough.
On 07/09/2015 06:28 PM, Owen Synge wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Lets put a positive spin on this thread and set all misunderstandings on
> my side :)
>
> I propose that John clarified and I misunderstood the others in upstream
> ceph-deploy's position,
Dear all,
Lets put a positive spin on this thread and set all misunderstandings on
my side :)
I propose that John clarified and I misunderstood the others in upstream
ceph-deploy's position, the style guide includes:
(0) Opposes duplication of code.
(1) Opposes duplication of code for each platf
> PPS I did not intentionally kill the branch and will investigate why its
> missing.
Correction it is not missing and is still here.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-deploy/pull/320
I still feel that I should close it in case people stop reviewing my
patches though.
Best regards
Owen
--
To unsubs
On 07/09/2015 12:46 PM, John Spray wrote:
> Owen,
Hi John,
thanks for your reasonable mail.
> Please can you say what your overall goal is with recent ceph-deploy
> patches?
To give ceph-deploy code features we have in downstream ceph-deploy to
upstream.
All I am trying to do is reduce copiou
Owen,
Please can you say what your overall goal is with recent ceph-deploy
patches? Whether a given structure is right or wrong is really a
function of the overall direction. If you are aiming to make
ceph-deploy into an extensible framework that can do things in parallel,
then you need to
Dear all,
The facade pattern (or façade pattern) is a software design pattern
commonly used with object-oriented programming. The name is by analogy
to an architectural facade. (wikipedia)
I am frustrated with the desire to "standardise" on the one bad practice
implementations of the facade patte
10 matches
Mail list logo
