Re: paddles query

2015-03-02 Thread Loic Dachary
On 02/03/2015 20:59, Zack Cerza wrote: Hey Loic, I gave an example in the ticket you filed (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10945#note-3) , but here it is again for posterity:

[PATCH V5 1/6] Build support for BlkKin (LTTng + Zipkin) tracing

2015-03-02 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
* Adds --with-blkin to autoconf (default without) * Adds BLKIN_LIBS to necessary automake files * Adds documentation for testing BlkKin tracing Signed-off-by: Andrew Shewmaker ags...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Marios-Evaggelos Kogias marioskog...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Chendi.Xue

[PATCH V5 2/6] Initial support for blkin (LTTng + Zipkin) tracing

2015-03-02 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
* Adds conditional build support. * Adds BLKIN_* macro wrappers to reduce need for ifdef WITH_BLKIN. * Adds blkin header include. * Adds message infrastructure for blkin tracing. * Adds blkin trace events and keyvals to OpTracker. * Adds osd, pg, journal, and filestore blkin traces to

[PATCH V5 6/6] Rados example for blkin (LTTng + Zipkin) tracing

2015-03-02 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
This code is Marios', with the following exceptions: * split out example from other tracing changes * changed name of example * whitespace issues have been fixed * Makefile cleans up the new example Signed-off-by: Marios-Evaggelos Kogias marioskog...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Filippos

[PATCH V5 4/6] OSD support for blkin (LTTng + Zipkin) tracing

2015-03-02 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
* Adds tracing for OSDs and Placement Groups, specifically: messages for OSD operations, FileJournal, FileStore, ECBackend, replication, and traced versions of Objecter read/write (only basic read/write functions). * Moves global_init_daemonize() earlier in ceph_osd.c:main

[PATCH V5 0/7] BlkKin (LTTng + Zipkin) tracing patchset intro

2015-03-02 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
The following patches are a cleaned up version of the work Marios Kogias first posted in August. http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg19890.html This patch is against HEAD as of March 2nd at 4:30pm Mountain. It can also be found at https://github.com/agshew/ceph/tree/wip-blkin-v5 Thanks to

[PATCH V5 3/6] Initialize ceph_mon trace, blkin (LTTng + Zipkin) tracing

2015-03-02 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
Signed-off-by: Marios-Evaggelos Kogias marioskog...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Filippos Giannakos philipg...@grnet.gr Signed-off-by: Andrew Shewmaker ags...@gmail.com --- src/ceph_mon.cc | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/ceph_mon.cc b/src/ceph_mon.cc index e0ca6e2..6c3f03f

[PATCH V5 5/6] Rados support for blkin (LTTng + Zipkin) tracing

2015-03-02 Thread Andrew Shewmaker
* Adds traced versions of Rados aio_read/write Signed-off-by: Marios-Evaggelos Kogias marioskog...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Filippos Giannakos philipg...@grnet.gr Signed-off-by: Andrew Shewmaker ags...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Chendi.Xue chendi@intel.com --- src/include/rados/librados.h |

Re: v0.93 Hammer release candidate released

2015-03-02 Thread Sage Weil
I forgot to mention a very important note for those running the v0.92 development release and upgrading: On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Sage Weil wrote: Upgrading - * If you are upgrading from v0.92, you must stop all OSD daemons and flush their journals (``ceph-osd -i NNN --flush-journal'')

Re: [ceph-users] v0.93 Hammer release candidate released

2015-03-02 Thread Sage Weil
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, Sage Weil wrote: I forgot to mention a very important note for those running the v0.92 development release and upgrading: On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Sage Weil wrote: Upgrading - * If you are upgrading from v0.92, you must stop all OSD daemons and flush their

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Hammer OSD Shard Tuning Test Results

2015-03-02 Thread Mark Nelson
Hi Alex, I see I even responded in the same thread! This would be a good thing to bring up in the meeting on Wednesday. Those are far faster single OSD results than I've been able to muster with simplemessenger. I wonder how much effect flow-control and header/data crc had. He did have

ceph branch status

2015-03-02 Thread ceph branch robot
-- All Branches -- Adam Crume adamcr...@gmail.com 2014-12-01 20:45:58 -0800 wip-doc-rbd-replay Alfredo Deza alfredo.d...@inktank.com 2014-07-08 13:58:35 -0400 wip-8679 2014-09-04 13:58:14 -0400 wip-8366 2014-10-13 11:10:10 -0400 wip-9730 Andrew Shewmaker

Re: rgw and the next firefly release

2015-03-02 Thread Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
- Original Message - From: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub yeh...@redhat.com To: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 8:55:42 AM Subject: Re: rgw and the next firefly release - Original Message - From:

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Hammer OSD Shard Tuning Test Results

2015-03-02 Thread Alexandre DERUMIER
This would be a good thing to bring up in the meeting on Wednesday. yes ! I wonder how much effect flow-control and header/data crc had. yes. I known that sommath also disable crc for his bench Were the simplemessenger tests on IPoIB or native? I think it's native, as the Vu Pham benchmark

Re: rados and the next firefly release

2015-03-02 Thread Samuel Just
Yeah, we don't need to worry about that one, good for QE to start. -Sam - Original Message - From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org To: Samuel Just sj...@redhat.com Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 7:42:53 AM Subject: rados and the next

Re: rgw and the next firefly release

2015-03-02 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi Yehuda, On 02/03/2015 17:08, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: - Original Message - From: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub yeh...@redhat.com To: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 8:55:42 AM Subject: Re: rgw and the

Re: rgw and the next firefly release

2015-03-02 Thread Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
- Original Message - From: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org To: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub yeh...@redhat.com Cc: Ceph Development ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 8:44:22 AM Subject: Re: rgw and the next firefly release Hi Yehuda, On 02/03/2015 17:08, Yehuda

Re: ceph versions

2015-03-02 Thread John Spray
On 26/02/2015 23:12, Sage Weil wrote: Hammer will most likely be v0.94[.x]. We're getting awfully close to 0.99, though, which makes many people think 1.0 or 1.00 (isntead of 0.100), and the current versioning is getting a bit silly. So let's talk about alternatives! I'm late to this thread,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-02 Thread Luis Pabon
What is the status on virtfs? I am not sure if it is being maintained. Does anyone know? - Luis - Original Message - From: Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-...@lists.openstack.org,

Re: paddles query

2015-03-02 Thread Zack Cerza
Hey Loic, I gave an example in the ticket you filed (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10945#note-3) , but here it is again for posterity: http://paddles.front.sepia.ceph.com/runs/teuthology-2015-03-01_23:18:01-multimds-hammer-testing-basic-multi/jobs/?status=fail Zack - Original Message

Tues/Wed CDS Schedule Posted

2015-03-02 Thread Patrick McGarry
Hey cephers, The basic schedule has been posted for CDS tomorrow and Wednesday. If you are a blueprint owner and are unable to make the slot you have been assigned please let me know. We're working with some pretty tight time constraints to make this all work, but there is a little wiggle room if

Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Hammer OSD Shard Tuning Test Results

2015-03-02 Thread Vu Pham
This would be a good thing to bring up in the meeting on Wednesday. yes ! Yes, we can discuss details on Wed's call. I wonder how much effect flow-control and header/data crc had. yes. I known that sommath also disable crc for his bench I disabled ceph's header/data crc for both